last elections?

Question

i hear liberal liars say that the republicans lost "bad" in the elections. in fact, 18 house seats were decided by 5000 votes or less. In the majority of the house seats the libs picked candidates who were Christian, pro Iraq, and against big govt while being anti-illegal immigration. In other words, they pretended to be republican. Heath Schuller in NC is an example but there are dozens of others. With the moderate republicans mostly losing, and these psuedo republican dems winning, the American people have elected a conservative pro defense messege again. the libs are so stupid that they have not figure that out yet?

the contract FOR america was another examply of a conservative messege that won. they were not conservatives pretending to be liberal. you sir, are a fool.

jordan--u are correct in the analogy u make. which simply proves my point, the democrats ran conservative candidates in 40 states because if the ran true democrats they would lose in 40 states... thats muh point boy

Answer 1

Haha. The Liberals are always lieing

Answer 2

Is that what your civics teacher said, eh?

However many house seats being lost by however many votes is only a relevant arguement to those who lost. The democrats did the same hand-wringing after the presidential election. An irrelvelant point...

In this day and age anyone wanting to be elected, for the most part, should be your basic "Christian..." Whether it be Catholic, Methodist, Lutheran, Presbyterian, Church of God, or whatever else it is.

This is not to be confused with the homosexual meth users that follow Pat Roberston and other "fundimental" short sighted types that have no concept of the islamic world, Somalia, North Korea, or the rest of the world, and possess this entirely simplistic view that a president can be judged simply by how he stands on abortion and gay rights.

Define your term "Christian..."

Pro Iraq? It's a little late now. It's obvious now that since we are there, we are stuck. If you are tying to say that the "majority" of people the liberals (or democrats?) chose were for attacking Iraq at the time, you are sadly mistaken unless you are making your own definition for "Majority" as you did with "Christian."

Big government and immigration stands are pretty safe for the moment not to mention obvious, and really, you just threw those two in there to make your stats look more impressive. C'mon, get off it, or you might as well throw in health care and flag burning.

And I have to laugh when you bring up Heath Schuller. Heath Schuller??? He's been called an "empty suit" but his own party, but that's North Carolina's problem and less Washington's.

All I can say is that you sure talk a lot, but you really don't have much substance. (You should take lessons from my answer...) Or, maybe you have political aspirations? If you do, you're good!

The point is more and more people are disillusioned with what's going on. We started out with a war against "Weapons of Mass Destruction," and when that didn't work, we switched to freeing those people from an evil desopt. Sounds to me like the domino theory to the Gulf of Tonkin resolution. Regardless, the American people have yet to be given a plausible explanation as to why, and now it looks like it's never going to end.

How intellegent did our leader look when he spouted off, "It's Over!" when Hussein was captured? Do you think there were very many people that heard that and said, "What? Are you nuts?"

and with respect to all your fancy terms you throw out at the end, you still sound like the democrats after the election trying to find some sort of silver cloud--moderate republicans... Psuedo Republicans....

The new term hasn't even started yet! Neither you nor I have a clue. Spend a little less time trying to sound like your an expert and act like you've been here before!

Answer 3

each and every person has this magnificent rainbow-colored image of what 8 years of Gore could've been like, yet once you incredibly think of roughly it, he replaced into Clinton's Vice, so he could've in all probability carried out purely as undesirable a job, perchance particularly greater advantageous, if not worse... for my section Democrats have it greater advantageous that they lost in 2000, it replaced right into a call between 2 undesirable applicants, had Gore gained, you may in all probability be asking the question "What if George W. Bush gained the final election". *remember, the Democrats supported the conflict in Iraq back then too, and what do you think of are the probabilities that a guy who owns his own private Jet could've solved worldwide Warming. all people who thinks existence could be greater advantageous now could be delusional.

Answer 4

I don't like how you say the democrats pretended to be republicans. Democrats came up with candidates who they thought would get votes--and they did. A democrat in North Dakota could easily be a republican in Massachusetts. A republican in California could be a democrat in Wyoming.


Further, there's no such thing as a "true" democrat or republican. How could there be?

I won't call you Ishmael, I'll call you *unreasonable.

Answer 5

Wow is there any straw you guys wont cling to.
Stop being childish and admit defeat.
The American people didnt vote for the Democrats they voted against the Republicans how does that make you feel?
Do you choke on the tears of anger at night?

Answer 6

who got the majority again... how many seats did Republicans lose?

most dems are Christian? so what's your point there?... and I don't think hardly any were pro-Iraq... maybe one or two... but you clearly don't keep up with politics much... check out the popularity of the war in Iraq...

but some conservatives like you say all dems are liberals and they all hate all these things that many democrats voted for?

who's the stupid one here?

Answer 7

Bush Admin officials predicted the war in Iraq would cost no more than 1.7 Billion $$$ and last weeks or months. If you believe that, then you'll believe anything I guess.

Answer 8

if more seats were up for election, the Repubs would have lost much more

Answer 9

So wasn't the reverse the case when your side wanted to foist the "Contract ON America" ON America?

Answer 10

yawn man you are getting boreing