Do you think the human race will evolve to abolish male-female singular pairing because it is not fit in terms of variability because of all the children within that family are genetically alike which is not very advantageous survivally. Threfore are we set for a BRave New World where all men and women interact for mere pleasure without singular lasting bonds.
2006-12-26 10:05:11 · 4 answers · asked by Zidane 3 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
I don't understand how this is evil, sex is merely for pleasure and to admit this is not very shameful, and you are evil or going to hell because of it is inexplicable
2006-12-26 10:16:43 · update #1
lol, yes! fortunately for saved Christians we will be raptured up long before we have to endure that filth for eternity. have fun heathens, Satan's gonna give you hell on earth for real!
2006-12-26 10:14:05 · answer #1 · answered by spamneggzzz 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You've limited your subject matter to interbreeding which has happen on isolated islands and has posed enormous consciences for the inhabitants.For the most part monogamy constitutes a healthy environment for the offspring and any genetic factors involved,Haven't you heard of STD's and what about being responsible.Being a male myself I wish it could be the other way but I have enough sense to know better.
2006-12-26 18:21:12 · answer #2 · answered by Rio 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you think sex is merely for pleasure then mere pleasure is all you will get out of it. If you think male-female monogamy is not fit, you ignore the power of millions of years of evolution. If it weren't fit it would likely have been replaced by something better by now.
You could expand your understanding of cooperation and competition among humans and human groups by reading Howard Bloom's "The Lucifer Principle."
If you think mere pleasure can replace singular lasting bonds, you've never had one.
2006-12-26 18:52:45 · answer #3 · answered by Philo 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
This is not so much a question as an airing of your views to start a discussion. The second answerer gave a very sensible answer. As a Christian myself, I deplore the first answer, which seems to me most un-Christian in attitude. We are called to love, not to taunt and rejoice in the expected demise of others, and certainly not to obsess over sexual mores which don't figure very largely in Jesus' teaching. But the questioner has been sucked in by the hang-ups of some religious people over sex, and is himself over-focussed on the matter.
2006-12-26 18:30:32 · answer #4 · answered by Hy 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋