English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

13 answers

No....that's just proof that you're ruler of the world...

2006-12-26 09:44:49 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

evaluate this: Scientists agree that the great Bang got here approximately extra or less 14 billion years in the past. additionally they concur that this replaced into the start of time in the universe. Time, as all of us realize it, is something that in basic terms exists in basic terms in the universe, no longer outdoors it. So however is outdoors the universe isn't limited through time, yet transcends it. that's an absolute. This suits the common description of God no longer having a beginning or end, when you consider that beginning and end advise existence interior of time, which God isn't believed to be limited through. additionally, the sheer actuality that the universe has a beginning is robust information of a God. In Stephen Hawkins e book, "a quick historic previous of Time", he states that when the great Bang concept replaced into first presented, it replaced into definitely the atheists who have been fighters of this thought, because of the fact it lent itself so strongly to a created beginning. the thought that each thing in basic terms constantly existed extra healthful extra constructive with their thought that a God wasn't necessary to describe the existence of the universe. it particularly is totally atypical that those perspectives have been switched. additionally, look at the guidelines of the universe. Gravity, math, physics, and so forth. those rules are all very specific, very strict, and intensely defined. there is not any way that they'd have come from thoroughly unguided origins. additionally, Stephen Hawkins mentions in his e book that had the preliminary enlargement of the universe after the great bang been a tiny little bit speedier, each thing would have larger too rapid for planets, existence, and so forth existence to ever type. additionally, had it been a fragment of a fragment slower, the universe would have collapsed returned into itself till now existence would have had of project to type. the great bang replaced into in basic terms acceptable. seems a sprint too coincidental to me. besides, i think of those information, between others which you would be able to get carry of, teach very functional information that the universe replaced right into a creation of an clever being. Who this clever being is, you will would desire to seek for out for your self.

2016-12-15 08:34:44 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Itty's at my house now, I'll let her come out and play in 5 months, she's wicked hott and I'm not going to share her anymore

2006-12-26 09:43:30 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 2 0

Say what?!?

Who`s Itty anyways?

What do you mean Canada isn`t real???

I`m Canadian!

?

2006-12-26 09:45:50 · answer #4 · answered by Lolita Angel Rose Taylor-Kennedy 3 · 0 0

No, it only proves that Itty isn't real.

2006-12-28 07:40:32 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yup.... I heard she was really from Alabama.

2006-12-26 09:46:00 · answer #6 · answered by Let there be JIMBO 4 · 0 0

got me

2006-12-26 09:42:54 · answer #7 · answered by jody n 7 · 0 0

You are too funny!

2006-12-26 09:43:50 · answer #8 · answered by The Nana of Nana's 7 · 0 0

Not at all.... it may just be a holiday....

2006-12-26 09:49:23 · answer #9 · answered by Papa 7 · 0 0

Nope I don't think so...

2006-12-26 11:10:16 · answer #10 · answered by ▒Яenée▒ 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers