1. Thousands
2. Millions
3. Both
4. At this moment America
5.None
6.I think they should have an Iraqi governments, so None of the Above.
7. By taking out the American Troops of Iraq and letting them decide what they want to do with their country.
2006-12-26 09:34:14
·
answer #1
·
answered by sweetbolbola 2
·
2⤊
2⤋
That scumbag should be happy all he's getting is hung!! If it were me doling out punishment, he would tortured for a few years first, a daily dose of mustard gas, so he knew what he put others through. Recently it's not Americans killing innocent Iraqies, it's Iraqies killing Iraqies!! When are the dummies going to WAKE UP!! The sooner there is peace, the sooner the Allied forces will leave. DUH!!! Any god that tells you to use your family as a shield and kill people, encourages the young to become martyers, with some false pretense of glory in the eyes of god, is not a god but a demon.(BTW, I know the true Muslim religion does NOT preach this), and those that preach hate and intolerance towards other, are Alcolytes of Satan, and not true followers of Mohammad or Jesus for that matter.
1. Millions dead, millions more tortured.
2. Thousands dead, mostly military and terrorists, some civilian, and it is very regrettable.
3. Saddam, beyond a shadow of a doubt!
4. Iran. not the people, but the clerics and leader. Their struggling economy, sanctions, and current UN resolutions are all due to their governments statements, support of terrorism and hard line attitude.
5. No-one has the right to kill Iraqies, But Iraqies don't have the right to kill either.
6. The already have their own government, with a good and fair cross section of all Iraqies. That's the idea of democracy, everyone is represented. All people are equal, not just sunnis, or Shi'ites, or Kurds, but all the people.
7. Peace can only be attained through, stopping terrorism, separating state and religion, and dialog.
2006-12-26 18:41:50
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
Yes well OK. You seem to have got a little mixed up in your reasoning. Saddam was an evil man who killed his own people. Bush is also guilty of killing people. That is in no way allowing Blair of the hook he has blood on his hands also. Saddam was tried in an Iraqi court and sentenced to death. Blair and Bush may have their time to come.
Iraq should have a government of their people. It is Iraqi people fighting each other. Once it stops the American and coalition troops will leave. So unless you want Saddam back then he must serve his sentence. We want peace who can say they do not unless you are a government making money from weapons.
War is never a nice thing. People get hurt who should not. Tell that to the Israeli children blown up by a car bomb or a child in Palestine playing in the street when an Israeli bomb is dropped. No has the right to take a life only God. So blame is easy but who do you blame?
2006-12-26 09:49:25
·
answer #3
·
answered by deadly 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
1) It is not a matter of the number but the character of the man. Saddam is a murderer, thief, and genocidal maniac. This is proven in his trial by iraqis.
2) Bush, while admittedly not perfect, has done exactly what he said and has protected the iraqi people as much as possible. Those that are dying now are dying at the hands of insurgents and al-qaeda and saddam loyalists. (by the way, stay where you are, it will only make things go more quickly)
3 saddam
4 iran
5 nonsense
6 iraqi, neither iranian nor american
7) NOt sure what the problem here is. Peace will be obtained when saddam is gone and the insurgents are quelled and iraqis take responsibility for their own lives.
2006-12-26 09:35:27
·
answer #4
·
answered by epaphras_faith 4
·
4⤊
1⤋
Well, look at it this way: If you were in the clutches of Saddam Hussein and he said you were going to be hung from a balcony, he wouldn't give even the slightest thought about how every human has a right to live. In fact, he never gave a damn about the Kurds, either. He just strolled right along and started to attempt genocide by killing people with poisonous gas. Were your life in his hands, he wouldn't have cared about this bullshit you're spewing. There is also a difference between plain massacre and war. Learn that difference.
Do you know why there are so many kids being killed in Iraq? It's because A) Their fathers use them as human shields against incoming fire and B) A lot of them willingly join their extremist fathers so they can fire a weapon once and then get shot in the name of Allah.
2006-12-26 14:23:56
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Saddam was an Iraqi problem, it should have stayed that way. Now we have Iraqis in the UK who claimed asylum that show no sign of going back (could you blame them) and a country which has become more radical Muslim which will pose a greater threat to the region than Saddam ever did. Pre-war he was 'contained' and even kept Al Quaeda under control as he was not particularly religious. That took less money, effort and no Allied lives were being lost. Iraqis may have suffered, but no more than they are now? At least the UK pre-war had integrity. A big mistake to follow Bush on his 'crusade'.
2006-12-26 09:55:36
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
Get over yourself. There isn't anything so called about America. It's America tried and true. Saddam was tried by an Iraqi court. He will be hung in less than 30 day. Sucks to be him. If he was tried in an American court he would have up to 27 years after his last appeal to be hung. I favor the Iraqi way in this regard. He got more justice than those he slaughtered. So your numerous boring words of outrage are lost on this participant.
2006-12-26 09:26:44
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
1⤋
He don't have been performed in any respect; for now he's a martyr in the minds of already enraged terrorists. whilst Sam Houston won the conflict of San Jacinto, a lot of his troops called for an execution. i do no longer think of Saddam would desire to have been at last set unfastened as replaced into Santa Anna, yet lifelong imprisonment would have accomplished extra to break his acceptance than killing him. Al Capone spent some years in San Quinton reformatory. whilst asked relating to the mythical crime determine, between the inmates pronounced "he's in basic terms yet another con".
2016-12-15 08:34:15
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The european diktat is that the death penalty is wrong, and if it is wrong then it is wrong in all cases and europeans should be appalled. It cannot be right for people you don't like.
However, as the death penalty remains in Iraq, then let it be. The US retains the death penalty so they are entitled to agree with the penalty.
2006-12-26 20:04:34
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
I feel sorry for Saddam as well, they should have just chucked a grenade into the hole he was hiding in and buried him there, save a lot of time and hassle.
2006-12-27 03:29:22
·
answer #10
·
answered by LYN W 5
·
2⤊
1⤋