Bill Clinton hasn't been President for 6 years? Or is it funnier watching them post gibberish?
2006-12-26 08:53:19 · 19 answers · asked by The Twist 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
ONE: Thanks for the gibberish, so, what's that have to do with Christmas?
2006-12-26 08:57:32 · update #1
"What a gibberish"
LOL
2006-12-26 08:59:52 · update #2
They are still after Clinton, because he is the last president to actually do anything worthwhile
2006-12-26 08:56:25 · answer #1 · answered by Anarchy99 7 · 3⤊ 7⤋
You know what I think is even funnier? How Liberals love that immoral donkey! You people are the reason this country is going to the dump. And Gibberish?? You Liberals are the worst! You can never have a civilized conversation without name calling or badmouthing someone! Get a life.
2006-12-26 08:59:24 · answer #2 · answered by marieandlucaspape 3 · 3⤊ 2⤋
What's even funnier about that 30-35 percent is that Bush is doing the right thing and no one agrees with him. Similar to how Lincoln was thought of during the Civil War. His job is to handle the U.S., not have everyone in America like him.
2006-12-26 08:57:48 · answer #3 · answered by Squawkers 4 · 5⤊ 1⤋
You should probably study political science. Clearly you have no idea what you are talking about. In general, we don't feel the effects of a presidency until 5 to 10 years later.
Bill Clinton's ineffectiveness and cowardice is why we have a nuclear armed North Korea and Osama Bin Laden.
2006-12-26 08:59:24 · answer #4 · answered by quarterback 2 · 5⤊ 2⤋
We are still paying the bill that Clinton left on the table... Al Queda, 9-11, UN Weapon Inspectors in Iraq, Embolden terrorists that feared no reprisals.
2006-12-26 08:59:58 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
It should also be pointed out that Carter hasn't been president for several decades. Whenever you point out Bush's shortcomings, a past president is thrown out as a worst case. The fact that we have had worst presidents than Bush doesn't make him a better one.
2006-12-26 09:02:58 · answer #6 · answered by Overt Operative 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I support Bush and when questions come up about Bush I don't compare what he does to what Clinton did. I don't see how Clinton has anything to do with what Bush does.
2006-12-26 09:10:06 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
It's the only thing they have to hold on to. Is to blame the dems, well go right ahead. We have been up against (nearly) worse than GWB. We will finish the job. Now, that we are in debt to our kazoozes over this war and bad spending, then the reps will be complaining when the dems try to pay some of it off. You know, an idea - maybe Bush should "have," to stay another year just to clean up the mess he made and help pay off our debts.
2006-12-26 08:59:56 · answer #8 · answered by docie555@yahoo.com 5 · 1⤊ 3⤋
No because this is politics and if one would look back, questions are asked about many past presidents and their policies. We should not limit a topic of discussion because someone doesn't like the subject matter.
2006-12-26 08:57:37 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
Because Bush had his fingers crossed when he took the oath. He thinks Clinton might still be president.
Go big Red Go
2006-12-26 09:11:07 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
What a gibberish, clinton Great president.
2006-12-26 08:58:43 · answer #11 · answered by silkieladyinthecity 3 · 0⤊ 6⤋