English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

9 answers

No, he's not. Bush, Blair, everyone responsible for Darfur (from the government to their juntas), in the same vein Chechnya, N. Korea and Papau. Osama bin Laden, everyone responsible for Kashmir, Kurdistan, Macedonia...I think the list is sadly, impossibly long:(

2006-12-26 08:28:11 · answer #1 · answered by Angry Daisy 4 · 1 0

Olmert

2006-12-26 18:56:30 · answer #2 · answered by Agentj100 4 · 0 0

Tony Blair for letting Cherie go outside without a bag on her head,,he's guilty of uglycide

2006-12-26 17:18:55 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

besides what was previously mentioned, we need to consider people like milosovic and sharon. As bush would say, wanted dead or alive

2006-12-26 16:37:53 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No he's not but he had the assets that were wanted by the big powers

2006-12-26 16:29:53 · answer #5 · answered by Bluefurball 3 · 1 0

he is the only leading man caught with his pants down.

2006-12-26 21:56:00 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Not at all, Sudan, Somalia come to mind as well.

2006-12-26 16:26:59 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

if not KILL UM ALL

2006-12-27 19:49:47 · answer #8 · answered by NIGEL R 7 · 0 0

BUSH
BLAIR

2006-12-26 16:21:51 · answer #9 · answered by Carefree? Noway! I wish! 4 · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers