No, he's not. Bush, Blair, everyone responsible for Darfur (from the government to their juntas), in the same vein Chechnya, N. Korea and Papau. Osama bin Laden, everyone responsible for Kashmir, Kurdistan, Macedonia...I think the list is sadly, impossibly long:(
2006-12-26 08:28:11
·
answer #1
·
answered by Angry Daisy 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Olmert
2006-12-26 18:56:30
·
answer #2
·
answered by Agentj100 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Tony Blair for letting Cherie go outside without a bag on her head,,he's guilty of uglycide
2006-12-26 17:18:55
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
besides what was previously mentioned, we need to consider people like milosovic and sharon. As bush would say, wanted dead or alive
2006-12-26 16:37:53
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No he's not but he had the assets that were wanted by the big powers
2006-12-26 16:29:53
·
answer #5
·
answered by Bluefurball 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
he is the only leading man caught with his pants down.
2006-12-26 21:56:00
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Not at all, Sudan, Somalia come to mind as well.
2006-12-26 16:26:59
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
if not KILL UM ALL
2006-12-27 19:49:47
·
answer #8
·
answered by NIGEL R 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
BUSH
BLAIR
2006-12-26 16:21:51
·
answer #9
·
answered by Carefree? Noway! I wish! 4
·
1⤊
2⤋