Assuming science rules, motivations are usually centered upon reproductive success strategies. These change as the situation changes - few women would care as much now if her male was physically aggressive to threats as they would have before, say, fire. So the prototypical American situation - or western society - how does it go? Is visual first, or knowledge of money, et cetera? Are women more likely statistically to prefer generous men, or more predictable, and usually successful, selfish men? Now that survival is not so hard, do women want men not much more intelligent than them, so they will not be overwhlemed, (ego thing,) or do they still go for the most intelligent man? Is it less about childbirth now? What are the strongest lasting influences on her determination of her optimal mate?
Please, no broad strokes. Give as much detail as you can. If you've got reliable, SCIENTIFIC sites, please list them. Thank you very much; happy holidays (maybe, if you celebrate).
Take care!
2006-12-26
07:40:18
·
4 answers
·
asked by
ergonomia
2
in
Social Science
➔ Psychology