because he's just so darned....
intellectually-challenged!
honestly, the things that come out of his mouth.....
make me wince everytime
2006-12-27 07:32:58
·
answer #1
·
answered by Zippy 7
·
0⤊
3⤋
Yes, considering that they have so much in common. Lincoln suspended the Habeaus Corpas to jail war protesters, shutdown hundreds of newspapers that disagreed with the war, and practically throughout the Bill of Rights during the Civil War. FDR signed the National Firearms Act of 1934, and signed executive order 9066 that forced 110,000 Japanese Americans into camps violating the Bill of Rights. Bush became the great leader that he is by following a lot of their examples.
2006-12-26 21:45:38
·
answer #2
·
answered by j 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
I'm not seeing your reasoning for saying he is a great man and one of the best leaders we have ever had. Saying he's better than Lincoln and FDR combined is subjective and without saying anything else, you just have an argument loaded with opinion that bears no logic or argument. What's so good about him?
2006-12-26 14:20:46
·
answer #3
·
answered by Jordan H 2
·
6⤊
2⤋
Not hardly! Bush is a yes man. He had Rumsfield run the military and was just a mouth piece.
He was put into office the first time by his Daddy's people and won the last election by a few votes. (I still can't believe that loser won)
Anyone who actually thinks Bush is doing a good job should be paying for their parent's health care.
Bush is a puppet without enough sense to realize he's in people's pockets.
Or he's just as money hungry and destructive as his party wants him to be.
Can you say failure?
I knew that you could.
2006-12-26 14:53:23
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
That's not saying much for our two greatest presidents then is it? Bush, great? You can't use the same two words in the same sentence. When all is said and done and history sits back to judge him - the Decider - he will be judged as the most incompetent, dumbest, stubborn and ignorant person to ever sit in the Oval Office. He makes James Buchanan, generally agreed by scholars to be the worst ever, look good.
2006-12-26 16:51:01
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
I would agree that he is great man and one of the best leaders in the world in the sense that the world is flat and eating pure lard is quite healthy. Other than that, I would have to say he is an abomination to all mankind.
2006-12-26 14:30:16
·
answer #6
·
answered by Kwan Kong 5
·
4⤊
1⤋
Because they've got more common sense. He's done more damage to America and to the rest of the world than just about anybody else who came to office via a quasi-democratic process. God knows where all this is going to end.
PS. Anybody know what's happened to New Orleans? And to all those folk who were separated from their families?
2006-12-26 14:21:34
·
answer #7
·
answered by mrsgavanrossem 5
·
5⤊
1⤋
Finally Someone who I agree with!!!, He is awesome. Did you realize that Lincoln was hated when he was alive? he only became popular when he was dead. or so im told. I so agree, he is the best, My favorite by far. Wow, i thought i would never see the day when people show a little respect for someone who doesnt care how he lookes to the public, but just wants to do what is right. YES!! and people cant agree because they are to many wimps out there who say "peace", and cant defend our country. What a catastrophe we would have now if kerry became president!
2006-12-26 14:24:55
·
answer #8
·
answered by Gods Girl...check my new profile 3
·
2⤊
4⤋
People have different opinions and point of view. They can't just agree with you.
By the way, we're on December 2006.
2006-12-26 17:20:25
·
answer #9
·
answered by Mysterio 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
are you being held captive by the man himself?
I would make the same statement too if he was paying me what you're getting!
(however, I don't get down on my knees for anyone!)
2006-12-27 18:06:00
·
answer #10
·
answered by mary_not_cathy 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I had to get in here and read your entire question.
Outside of the fact that in the last 50 years there have never been more voters that have disagreed with you, your comparisons are absolutely ridiculous.
I didn't think you had any verifiable statements to even remotely back up your statement, but I had to check.
2006-12-26 14:30:04
·
answer #11
·
answered by LongSnapper 4
·
5⤊
2⤋