2006-12-26 06:01:17 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
I won't lose any sleep. He can be the "Sultan of Swing" then,
2006-12-26 06:25:19 · answer #1 · answered by tabs 3 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Iraq is keeping the rope. Saddam grew to become into stumbled on responsible and sentenced via the Iraqi human beings. So he will basically carry close. The bathist occasion and tallaban could hemorrhage some turds. i think of a feeling of protection and the wind being taken out of extremist sails is basically too lots to wish for. He could attain Martyr status yet this is iffy as Islam is keeping the rope. we will basically ought to observe and see.
2016-11-23 18:05:42 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I believe that Saddam Hussein is historically one of the better rulers that the Middle East has seen. This is made evident in the modernization of Iraq. Iraq is light years ahead of other countries in the region. He did not have weapons of mass destruction, and Iraq was invaded on false pretenses. The United Nations suggested that we should not engage in this war, and yet we again prove our ignorance and empirical ambitions by doing it anyway. We are going to cost the region billions of dollars in order to rebuild. His trial found him guilty of crimes he committed in 1982, nearly a quarter of a century ago. The United States backed him and condoned his actions then. His acts were in an effort to route out the bandit groups of people who attempted to assassinate him. Also, Iraqi laws and traditions are quite different than those of the United States. Saddam Hussein was an elected official who was placed in power by the hands of his own people election after election. Most over there would still rather if he were in power. I don't believe he's the best guy, or even a good guy for that matter, but I never have supported execution for anyone regardless of the crime. Incarcerate him for eternity if you like, but regardless of someone's actions or what they may or may not have done, who are we to take their life in our own hands?
2006-12-26 06:08:13 · answer #3 · answered by Deron Dantzler 2 · 3⤊ 6⤋
Not me. Iraqis have been waiting for this day God knows for how long. They can finally exact revenge on him the same way Italians did with Mussolini.
2006-12-26 07:17:56 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Nope, the sooner the better! Short drop with a sudden stop!
2006-12-26 06:04:21 · answer #5 · answered by Jim Ignatowski 3 · 3⤊ 2⤋
I oppose the death penalty in general, especially when it is in such a cruel and unusual manner.
2006-12-26 06:08:36 · answer #6 · answered by Jeremy 2 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Me, because if he's responsible for the deaths of many people, then bush should also be hanged for having many innocent civilians killed in Iraq.
2006-12-26 06:29:33 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 4⤋
I'd rather gas him like he did the Kurds, and just before he dies put him out of his misery with a machine gun, then feed his stinking corpse to pigs. If given the chance I would do it myself.
2006-12-26 06:24:44 · answer #8 · answered by mountainclass 3 · 1⤊ 4⤋
No....I think the penalty is fitting. He killed so many people why would I be opposed to his death?
2006-12-26 06:12:07 · answer #9 · answered by one 3 · 3⤊ 3⤋
well, i dont think we should have the right to take someones life from them.... but tell that to the hundreds of thousands HE killed... i'm indiferet, i just hope he is ready to meet his Maker
2006-12-26 06:09:54 · answer #10 · answered by liss 2 · 1⤊ 3⤋