breachin public rights of way footpaths or bridle paths?

Question

public right of way over private land

Answer 1

The curse of the countryside - public footpaths. Originally introduced to enable pedestrian agricultural workers to take the shortest route to work, they are now a conduit to bring all manner of would be trespassers, vandals and other criminals to the heart of private land. If this is not bad enough, the poor land owner is burdened with the legal responsibility of ensuring the safety of these most unwelcome visitors even to the extent of curtailing his or her normal activity.
Typical of legislation introduced by envious, selfish politicians eager to impress their urban constituents.

Answer 2

If u need to use one and u can't see the path then u should walk were it is less likely to affect any thing inside the area or around the edge of the land is best. DOE gold few years back.

They must let u on their land if its a public right of way and in Scotland u have the right to rome.


I think that people who stand in the way on footpaths should get penalised just like cars do.

Answer 3

If it's a public right of way, then the public have right of way! The fact that it's on private land is irrelevant. If you mean not staying on the public right of way or bridle path, and damaging your private land, that's trespass, but you have to know who did it and have evidence before you can charge anyone.

Answer 4

The "public" has to get a courtorder of a right-of-way deed from the vesting owner of a piece of property to build any kind of road, path, etc. A bridle path is a haircut for a horse?

Answer 5

So what are you asking? If there is a public right of way over private land, the landowner has to allow people to follow it.

Answer 6

I know quite a bit about rights of way but you need to sort out your question, I've no idea what you're trying to ask :)

Answer 7

And wat dee hek dee on!!!!!!!!!!!!1