the premier league. They are third rate. I watched every second of todays match and couldn't believe my eyes. Pathetic bunch of rich nancy boys. That is what Chelsea is.
2006-12-26 04:38:06 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Football ➔ English Football
Or maybe Reading is a good team and Coppell a great manager ?
2006-12-26 09:21:16 · answer #1 · answered by Non_Flying_Dutchman 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Your almost wrong, I always say that you have to have at least 9 players all playing well to win a match, 8 will probably get you a draw...however Chelsea at the moment have a few players who think they can stroll around the park, (1)Shevchenko hasnt settled (2) Ballarouze is supposed to be a central defender but gets caught out of position too often (3)Hilario is not a premiership goal keeper, for the Reading first goal he didnt stretch to save he just dived his body, thats 3 from 11 leaves 8, Mikel for me should be an Arsenal player, they suit his style, Ashley Cole replaced Wayne Bridge and lost his positioning for the Reading 2nd, had he not he would have taken time to clear properly. Frank Lampard is being forced out of the game by Ballack as they both perform a similar role, They were lucky they didnt lose but a point is a point
2006-12-26 05:03:22 · answer #2 · answered by bluefurball 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think what makes them trail is firstly the fact that they won it twice and secondly their financial power... They don't even match clubs like Milan, Madrid, Man U financially but in terms of not worrying about spending they are far away the richest.
To understand this better it means any including Liverpool, Arsenal and Man U when they play Chelsea they prepare themselves as if they want to play the Champions League final agaisnt Barca or Milan and that's why Chelsea is now suffering.
All those small teams only mind playing Chelsea and when it comes to others they don't bother to focus at their maximum.
Chao!
2006-12-26 22:59:19 · answer #3 · answered by Invasion 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Obviously it's money that keeps them in. They buy new players, they win for a while, they start to suck, they buy new players... and so on. They are a disgrace... there should be a Profit / Expenditure limit on Premier league clubs... Basically every club has the same limit to spend on players each season, plus a percentage of the previous seasons profits... that way chelsea wouldn't be able to buy any players for a few years! that would stop them from taking the P*SS
2006-12-26 04:42:32 · answer #4 · answered by john c 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i was at the Newcastle vs Chelsea Carling Cup match last week and Chelsea beat Us 1-0 only because they got a free kick and were allowed to take it 4 yards forward so they could get a better shot on goal. The Newcastle fans chanted all the way through the match "SAME OLD CHELSEA ALWAYS CHEATING" and after watching this match i agree with them. If it hadn't been for theit cheating we would have still been in the Carling Cup. Does anyone agree with me?
2006-12-26 05:28:30 · answer #5 · answered by pepsipest 1 · 3⤊ 0⤋
What rubbish.
There are lots of worse teams than Chelski, look at the Everton v Borobore game, did you see Charlton against Liverpool the other week, now that was pathetic.
So Chelski failed to win and for that they are a disgrace to the league, yeah...
2006-12-26 05:03:25 · answer #6 · answered by NM 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
look let me tell you something if money could do anything real madrid would have never lost a game but yet they get worser each month but chelsea fc is a team of confidence sure they might have their trippy wins but they know its the players that
that are resbonsible for making the team win not the money or the coachs_unlike some other teams
2006-12-26 08:42:11 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
at the end of the day, they will still be challenging for all the trophys at the business end of the season...of course they wont win them all...i think though u should try & make ur point in a different way...it comes across as though u just want to slag them off because u hate them...yes i did think they were rubbish against reading, wigan, newcastle & they r my team...i dont think this season the money has been spent wisely & i also question the wisdom to sell gudjohnnsen...i know its annoying for other teams who dont have so much cash to spend, but is it not proving the point that money doesnt always buy success...after all, look at leeds, forest & sheff wed now..........
2006-12-27 00:59:07 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i honestly believe chelsea are the worst of the top four teams atm and have been lucky in some games so far.. they are just overpayed players.
man utd will win the premiership this season. but they do need to buy a new striker.
2006-12-26 04:43:30 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
in my opinion,look what number managers chelsea have had in the previous couple years,the club is surely no longer stable each time quickly! all of the gamers are going too go away whilst they comprehend this and are in all risk in basic terms enjoying at chelsea for the acceptance and funds!
2016-12-15 08:26:13 · answer #10 · answered by shoaf 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋