Which poses a bigger threat to the world? Islamic extremists or Evangelical Christians?

Question

Please no Bush is this or that or libs are this and cons are that, for that is not what I asked.

Answer 1

Islam is a huge threat to all mankind . there teaching are truly evil this is the truth i urge people to read there books or at least hear from some of them about what they are taught. there was a man on pal talk a man who was a former Muslim leader a kind of minister i suppose and he went chapter by chapter through the books and invited Muslims to disprove even one thing he said was in the books and night after night not one could do that.
they did come in and swear a lot and some really tried to disprove what he was saying but none could the man is now a Christan and had to leave Islam or he would have been killed.
evangelical Christan's at the most come knocking on your door with some pamphlets and an offer to talk and come to there church but i am not aware of them spreading the word by the sword. which is the main precept of the Muslim religion

Answer 2

The Christians are not threatening to blow up the world, nor are they saying that everyone must convert to Islam.

In Somolia. the Muslims are attempting to open yet a third front. The Ethiopian Christians are confronting them, successfully for now, but as the muslims continue their assult more and more will join the fight, just as they have in Afghanistan and Iraq.

It's time NATO kicked a few of it's partners in the @ss to get some help in stopping these maniacs. Germany, France, Spain, and Italy have done hardly anything to help out. It's time they stood up at the plate and made some serious commitment, or got their @ss out of NATO altogether.

Islam is a curse on the world community and must be defeated. I hope this answers your question, at least from my perspective?

Answer 3

E. Christians do not pose a threat because they are going around blowing up innocents and crashing planes into buildings. The ones who are allegedly E. Christians are connected in someway to those terrorists. Our faith as Christians by its very nature is peaceful and loving. Not so with SOME. NOT all forms of Islam.

Answer 4

The question really would have more sense had you showed the comparsion on how the two are alike.
I've never seen the proof that Christians are chanting "death to non-Christians". Nor have I read any news articles about Christians beheading people because they don't believe the way they want them to.
I missed the riots Christians preformed when someone made art of Mary with manure or any of the vulgur cartoons of Jesus.
And I guess they've hidden all the articles about Christians bombing London, Spain, and all other nations they are now in the process of taking over.

Answer 5

I consider you that violent Islamic zealots are threat to peace, achievable each bit as authentic and serious as that of the Nazi bunds interior the Thirties. yet USAs strikes viz a viz those zealots have made it sparkling that the U. S. government (or a minimum of Bush & Co) are achievable to international peace of their very own appropriate, fairly taking the spotlight off the zealots. If u . s . a . had persevered to handle the zealots as a international regulation enforcement subject, extremely than as an excuse to invade a sovereign united states of america in basic terms tangentally related with the zealots, then we would now be looking decrease back at 5 years of frequently effective regulation enforcement efforts instead of 5 years frequently failed militia adventures. The spotlight could have remained on the zealot's wrongdoings, and not have shifted to the greater superb wrongdoings people forces occupying Iraq. My analogy is feuding acquaintances. If Bob is firing paintballs at Jim's domicile and vehicle, Bob is obviously interior the incorrect -- a threat to the peace of the community. If Jim responds via calling regulation enforcement, Jim has taken suited action in the direction of restoring and keeping the peace of the community. yet while Jim responds via counter-attacking Bob's domicile, Jim makes himself additionally culpable in threatening the peace. however, Jim would have long previous to the community association, provided some deceptive a million/2-truths pointing to Dave by using fact the "authentic" miscreant, and led a posse to attack Dave's domicile. It would not take a crystal ball to appreciate how community communicate could bypass -- particularly whether that's subject-loose expertise that Jim has a protracted status feud with Dave. with the objective to get decrease back on your question: What we are able to do greater useful is stop appearing like a juvenile gangboy -- "He dissed me guy, and however he does, i'm gonna do the comparable yet worse" -- and resume appearing like the chief of the loose international.

Answer 6

Evangelical Christians are just annoying where Islamic extremists will saw through your neck.

Answer 7

Islamic extremists are willing to kill for their beliefs, but I'm not sure mainstream Evangelical Christians are as handy with explosives and firearms.

Answer 8

The Islamic jihadists will bring about the end of the world. It's only a question of "if" not "when" they aquire nukes or bio weapons. They will not hesitate to use them while the UN debates sanctions or useless rhetoric.
good luck

Answer 9

Both pose a big threat to the world.

Answer 10

Extremism in any form poses a threat but the extremist Muslims are more of a threat than Christians. Christians don't go around blowing themselves up in the name of their God. They don't believe that anyone that isn't Christian should be killed.

Extremist Muslims are far more dangerous.