Time is drawing near my friends: Will Lib Dems break up our security systems?

Question

Only if we give American killing Terrorists the same, or better privileges than ourselves will the Democratic Party continue with the current excellent security measures.

Answer 1

You say Democrats will "break up our security systems?" Who do you think reduced of our cold war forces and missile programs one year after the Gulf War against Saddam? Here is an excerpt from Bush Sr.'s 1992 State of the Union address:

"Two years ago, I began planning cuts in military spending that reflected the changes of the new era...

"We will cancel the ICBM program. We will cease production of new warheads for our sea-based missiles. We will stop all production of the peacekeeper missile. And we will not purchase any more advanced cruise missiles.

"...if the commonwealth, the former Soviet Union, will eliminate all land-based multiple-warhead ballistic missiles, I will do the following: We will eliminate all Peacekeeper missiles. We will reduce the number of warheads on Minuteman missiles to one and reduce the number of warheads on our sea-based missiles by about one-third. And we will convert a substantial portion of our strategic to primarily conventional use.

"....The reductions I have approved will save us an additional $50 billion over the next five years. By 1997 we will have cut defense by 30 percent since I took office. "

Answer 2

Yeah, us constitution hating liberals plan on destroying our civil liberties and dispersing those things that keep us safe. Things like Bush's Military Commissions act that removed the right of habeus corpus from the constitution, thereby gutting the Bill of Rights (A bill that he said was so desperately needed for the safety of our nation that he had it shoved through congress only to let it sit for three weeks on his desk before signing it into law). Or things like the NSA spying program. A program that violates existing laws and the constitution. Yeah. We hope to destroy these 'necessary security measures' so the terrorists will win.

Answer 3

in the start, all activities are coalitions of human beings that've agreed to artwork to a elementary purpose. they received't all agree on ends or ability, yet until eventually they stay united they're going to end to be a get at the same time and change into only a group of independants. Independants almost under no circumstances get elected. Its like the former rule in conflict, a disciplined pressure will continually beat an undisciplined one, even at the same time as outnumbered. no one is forced to settle for the Whip, yet in case you do not you effectively renounce from the get at the same time. the authentic situation is the administration MPs exercising over their administration. The get at the same time caucus might want to make coverage, not the chief. The Liberal Democrats had distinct options. they'd have shaped a coalition with a discredited Labour get at the same time which had lost self belief in itself. they'd have stayed out of authorities and voted on topics on a case with the help of case foundation. Or, they could connect a coalition with the Conservatives. The LibDem administration replaced into hoping that transforming into a member of the authorities would develop their credibility as a get at the same time in fantastic condition to carry workplace, and would supply them the electoral reform which they desire will lead them to an eternal element of authorities, like the loose Democrats in Germany. in my opinion, i imagine the right outcome will be a good more beneficial polarisation of British politics. The LibDems are in probability of splitting into left and good wings, and the area of the known public which said them as a third way has drastically decreased in length.

Answer 4

First of all, I'd like to know what security systems you're talking about. Do you mean the fine job they've been doing guarding our southern border these past five years? Or are you talking about the wonderful job they've been doing guarding our ports. Or maybe you're speaking about the demolition of our constitution. I fear, my friend, that you're talking out of your wrong end.

Answer 5

So soon we forget that the most of the wars we won were won by Liberals.

FDR, Truman, Lincoln (back when the Republican party was the Liberal one) and Washington. Are all great examples.

Answer 6

Take a laxative man you seem in distress.Are you serious or are you a white house apologist.Wake up real security is coming.

Answer 7

you frank are the reason that republicans lost in November.... America is tired of your rhetoric and non-sense on how to fight the war on terror....

if you haven't figured it out: the republican Bush policy has made America less safe, more hated, and has breeded more terrorists against American than Bin Laden ever dreamed of!!!!!!!!

Answer 8

You mean like the Republican's Patriot Act?

Answer 9

Not sure what your talking about? you speak of a political party, then "we" it does not make any sense

Answer 10

Not likely, but they will damage it. And while they wring their hands and wonder what we did to deserve the impending attack, we will recall and vote those pink appeasers out and fix it permanently.