i think you are confusing the term homosexual with perverts and people who clearly have a mental problem!
2006-12-26 02:27:29
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
I don't approve of everyone's private lifestyle but it's their's as long as they keep it separate from their jobs. I believe in moral integrity, but what did Enron have to do with sex?
I think society would be safer to be tolerant of all choices and "handicaps" that DO NOT AFFECT unconsenting others.Then we'd probably know more about who's who. Who are we to judge otherwise? If I'm a physical fitness buff and you've got a giant beer belly that could kill you and leave your children penniless orphans on welfare, do I have right to publicly ridicule you?
A PRIVATE lifestyle is not necessarilly a menace to society. It's when they can't control it and prey upon unconsenting creatures that it becomes an atrocity. Pedophiles do an awful lot of damage, mentally deranged people of all sexual persuasions commit more attrocities than homosexuals. Homosexuality per se, left to itself, may not be the natural order of procreation, it may be a genetic mismatch, but it is not a mental illness. Usually, society's pressures have pushed it into being one if it is. Not all homosexuals are mentally ill, nor a menace to society.
I'd like to know who my neighbors and leaders are, but I'd rather know if they are early released drunk drivers and pedophiles than life partner homosexuals.
I've known people hurt for life for all reasons under the sun by any number of people they trusted.
I doubt that the majority of politicians backing un-wars which have killed and maimed so many young men and torn up their families are homosexual.
Please widen your scope. Keep your eagle eye open for ALL types of questionable behavior. Gather facts responsibly before bringing them to the notice of appropriate authorities.
I don't know as "infiltrated" carries the right connotation. That sounds like a planned take-over. I doubt that completely.
2006-12-26 03:12:01
·
answer #2
·
answered by Casperia 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't understand what you mean by "infiltrate". Has far as I'm aware if a person is qualified to fill a position their sexual orientation really doesn't matter. I may be reading this wrong, but you seem to be implying some sort of homosexual conspiracy to "infiltrate" positions of power.
2006-12-26 02:39:50
·
answer #3
·
answered by the_mad_yovo 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
the two via deception of "come to this ghetto to your risk-free practices" or via brutal rigidity. undergo in suggestions an excellent form of the people who accompanied Hitler have been prepared to enable the Nazi social gathering understand who replaced right into a Jew, Gypsy, gay etc.
2016-10-19 00:08:01
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
"Infiltrated" is quite a harsh word. Is someone that is gay supposed to have a specific job or something???? Why couldn't they hold these jobs????
2006-12-26 02:44:46
·
answer #5
·
answered by chazzer 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
How does this affect your life? Does it really matter? With everything else going on in the world, who really cares. Like Al Sharpton said one time in a debate, "who cares who goes to bed with who at night. As long as they get up and work the next day..".
2006-12-26 02:28:19
·
answer #6
·
answered by badneighborvt 3
·
2⤊
2⤋
Who could know, if they're in the closet? That's why it's better that they were out, and they can only be out if they get acceptance and tolerance.
2006-12-26 02:27:45
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
infiltrate? Maybe they are just working in their chosen field?
2006-12-26 02:34:44
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Obviously, the "closeted" kind. That "percentage" is false and was proved so this fall.
2006-12-26 02:37:39
·
answer #9
·
answered by incognitas8 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
more than you think but I can't give you a percentage but it may be a lot. do a seach if you need to know.
2006-12-26 02:27:21
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋