Time for Bush to GOOOOOOOOOO ?

Question

Don't you think?

Answer 1

Yes, Impeachment is the only course now. Democrats should start the investigation now and get a vote in the Senate before next election. Some Republicans will support Impeachment rather than look bad and lose there job in 2008. The people have spoken and they want a Change in direction of this Country. Bush is not willing to change or even care what the people want. The will of the people should be served by Congress. He must be forced.
I just read a story about how the Bush cronies awarded $1 to $2 billion in no bid contracts to Republicans after Katrina. According to The investigation going on now many will be headed for prison. This Country can not survive another two years with Bush's lack of leadership. The list of Crimes is very, very long.
Investigation by Congress into these crimes is a obligation and Duty Congress can not shun.

Answer 2

Well we had an election, it sent a message about the war in Iraq. Most Americans think we should get out.
The President is talking about a build up and is sending in some ships and an aircraft carrier into the region. Build up. This is exactly what the People do not want! This is only the President's war. The war on terrorism is a different war. The war in Iraq is a civil war. We cannot be caught up in a civil war between different factions of a country. Look at Vietnam and Korea. Have we won there?
No just a lot of dead people. The death toll now in Iraq is greater than the loss of 911. The middle east is less stable now than ever. Our policy there has not worked and will not work if we just send in a few more troops and keep doing the same thing. Sooner or later the Iraqis have to stand up. They won't do this in my opinion, because they are too committed to tribals and militias, before the government of Iraq. We have all the Generals, most of them retired, saying it is time for Bush to go.
If the President is impeached, then Dick is President. That would even be worse. I think the Congress should bring these two to accountability of their mistakes made.
Nancy Pelozi would do fine as President until the elections. She could not do any worse than the ones we have now. I think our Leaders are on the brink of putting us in a World War 3. It is just a matter of time. When people fight over territrory, or for self defense it is one thing, But to fight for ideolgy is just wrong. Where has our dipomacy went too? When two people married, have differences, and one is not willing to comprimise and communicate with the other, seperation first comes, then divorce. We have seperated our selves from most of the world. What comes next, Divorce? World War?

Answer 3

Congratulations for taking this serious political forum and turning it to partisan issues. Much better to have people think red vs blue than actually to think as individuals.

Answer 4

I'd say yes, but that means Cheney would take over. So . . . I'll stick with dumb over evil for the next 2 years.

Answer 5

I'm sure there's a bathroom somewhere in the White House. If he hasn't found one yet, he has two more years to do so.

Answer 6

Presided over the loss of approximately three million American jobs in his first two-and-a-half years in office, the worst record since Herbert Hoover.
Overseen an economy in which the stock market suffered its worst decline in the first two years of any administration since Hoover’s.

Taken, in the wake of the terrorist attacks two years ago, the greatest worldwide outpouring of goodwill the United States has enjoyed at least since World War II and squandered it by insisting on pursuing a foolish go-it-almost-alone invasion of Iraq, thereby transforming almost universal support for the United States into worldwide condemnation. (One historian made this point particularly well: “After inadvertently gaining the sympathies of the world 's citizens when terrorists attacked New York and Washington, Bush has deliberately turned the country into the most hated in the world by a policy of breaking all major international agreements, declaring it our right to invade any country that we wish, proving that he’ll manipulate facts to justify anything he wishes to do, and bull-headedly charging into a quagmire.”)
Misled (to use the most charitable word and interpretation) the American public about weapons of mass destruction and supposed ties to Al Qaeda in Iraq and so into a war that has plainly (and entirely predictably) made us less secure, caused a boom in the recruitment of terrorists, is killing American military personnel needlessly, and is threatening to suck up all our available military forces and be a bottomless pit for the money of American taxpayers for years to come.
Failed to follow through in Afghanistan, where the Taliban and Al Qaeda are regrouping, once more increasing the threat to our people.
Insulted and ridiculed other nations and international organizations and now has to go, hat in hand, to those nations and organizations begging for their assistance.
Completely miscalculated or failed to plan for the personnel and monetary needs in Iraq after the war, so that he sought and obtained an $87 billion appropriation for Iraq, a sizable chunk of which is going, without competitive bidding to Haliburton, the company formerly headed by his vice president.
Inherited an annual federal budget surplus of $230 billion and transformed it into a $500+ billion deficit in less than three years. This negative turnaround of three-quarters of a trillion dollars is totally without precedent in our history. The ballooning deficit for fiscal 2004 is rapidly approaching twice the dollar size of the previous record deficit, $290 billion, set in 1992, the last year of the administration of President Bush’s father and, at almost 5 percent of GDP, is closing in on the percentage record set by Ronald Reagan in 1986.
Cut taxes three times, sharply reducing the burden on the rich, reclassified money obtained through stock ownership as more deserving than money earned through work. The idea that dividend income should not be taxed—what might accurately be termed the unearned income tax credit—can be stated succinctly: “If you had to work for your money, we’ll tax it; if you didn’t have to work for it, you can keep it all.”
Severely curtailed the very American freedoms that our military people are supposed to be fighting to defend. (“The Patriot Act,” one of the historians noted, “is the worst since the Alien and Sedition Acts under John Adams.”)
Called upon American armed service people, including Reserve forces, to sacrifice for ever-lengthening tours of duty in a hostile and dangerous environment while he rewards the rich at home with lower taxes and legislative giveaways and gives lucrative no-bid contracts to American corporations linked with the administration.
Given an opportunity to begin to change the consumption-oriented values of the nation after September 11, 2001, when people were prepared to make a sacrifice for the common good, called instead of Americans to ‘sacrifice’ by going out and buying things.
Proclaimed himself to be a conservative while maintaining that big government should be able to run roughshod over the Bill of Rights, and that the government must have all sorts of secrets from the people, but the people can be allowed no privacy from the government. (As one of the historians said, “this is not a conservative administration; it is a reckless and arrogant one, beholden to a mix of right-wing ideologues, neo-con fanatics, and social Darwinian elitists.”)

Answer 7

i think you better check your watch i think its running about 6 years to slow

Answer 8

The way this site works, I think you'll find that this q or most of the ans. will be deleted by day's end.
http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/bones.htm

Answer 9

He did a a lot of mistakes. He has to go right now

Answer 10

I think this administration has overstayed their time. First, some answers and then they should be joining Abramoff; I consider them to be traitors! GWB can eat all his "signing statements" in a prison cell.