Don't they know that most parents want to know what is in a movie before they will let their kids watch it? What's wrong with keeping all movies rated?
2006-12-26 00:46:51 · 10 answers · asked by osunumberonefan 5 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
Because they think they might beable 2 get money out of it. And they want the kids 2 be "educated" in that area
2006-12-26 13:56:30 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Basically, they film material that will not get the film past the rating system and into theaters. This material is typically cut out to give the move an R-rating. When released on DVD, you will often see a theatrical version and an Unrated or Director's Cut that puts a lot of this material back in for those who decide to view it. And, there is a market for unrated versions of films both in the US and overseas.
They know that some parents will not approve. These films are not being marketed to parents. Parents just need to look for the 'unrated' designation and not buy that version of the film.
2006-12-26 00:52:38 · answer #2 · answered by bionicbookworm 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Since the unrated version isn't released in the theaters, only on DVD, I don't see what the problem is. There is so much that is censored by the MPA that you almost need an unrated version if you want edgy or mature content. Honestly, if your kid is too young to be watching an unrated movie, you should be paying attention to what they're watching.
2006-12-26 00:49:56 · answer #3 · answered by leaptad 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yeah, the 40 yr old virgin isnt for kids..... releasing an unrated version is just to make more money, plus the unrated versions are usually better.
2006-12-26 01:24:47 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
The 40 Year Old Virgin is not a kid's movie. I would have guessed that from the title, rating or no rating. Unfortunately, too many parents allow their kids to watch things that are inappropriate for them, or let them play M rated games starting at age 10, then wonder why their kids are screwed up.Common sense should prevail over ratings
2006-12-26 00:51:18 · answer #5 · answered by eastcoastdebra 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ironically in some countries... Unrated doesn't mean anything. It still receives its rating sticker and its appropriate restrictions. For example, Singapore. Unrated VCDs get the rating M18(no one under 18). So its really the same thing depending where you are.
2006-12-26 01:07:12 · answer #6 · answered by Kiver29 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A girl who starts menstruating as younger as 9 years ancient is regarded to be inside the range of medically "common" sexual progress. It is probably not common, however there are without doubt boys who begin to increase exact sexual emotions and recognize their orientation as younger as 10. "The normal Scouting divisions are Cub Scouting for boys a while 7 to 10½ years, Boy Scouting for boys a long time 10½ to 18 and Venturing for younger men and females ages 14 (or thirteen and have accomplished the eighth grade) through 21." The foremost issue isn't the rare Cub Scout whose sexual development begins at an surprisingly younger age, however the quality quantity of Boy Scouts who can be medical anomalies if they didn't improve a designated sexual orientation via the exit age of 18.
2016-08-10 02:53:26 · answer #7 · answered by girtman 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It costs money to get a movie rated. Sometimes the director wants a certain scene, but it messes up the ratings for it, so they release, in essense< a director's cut.
It is alos a great marketing ploy, as you wonder what was taken out of it.
Like "The Girl Next Door", what could they have taken out that could make it more of an "R" than it already was?
2006-12-26 01:30:12 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because it's an inappropiate movie if it's unrated. It's worse then it is in theaters. But if you decide to watch it that's your choice.
2006-12-26 00:58:47 · answer #9 · answered by Phil 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Its just a gimmick to get more capital out of the picture
2006-12-26 00:50:24 · answer #10 · answered by vanman8u 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋