English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

My question is, do you still support this evil and corrupt person?

2006-12-26 00:34:34 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

18 answers

you see things obviously now without wearing glasses. you are on the right way. (BUSH is a dracula) this is the truth, he live on killing people even Americans by sending them to be killed out of the USA , ONLY FOR ONE REASON ( to fill thier pockets of money & oil)

2006-12-26 00:43:16 · answer #1 · answered by Zaki M 2 · 3 1

In my opinion, Bush did the right thing but in the wrong place. Osama bin Laden does not (or did not) live in Iraq, but Afghanistan. Bush went into Iraq to finish what his father started, and to fatten his and all his corporate CEO sponsor's wallets.
He did the right thing by taking the battle over there, but didn't go about it properly. Iraq has been fighting within itself and with every neighboring country for 5000 years, we are not going to make a difference now. We need to pull out troops out of Iraq, go after bin Laden in Afghanistan until we know he is dead or captured and wipe out the Taliban.

2006-12-26 00:57:19 · answer #2 · answered by one eye 3 · 4 1

I personally voted Democrat, and I honestly feel very sorry for, whomever will be our next "Prez"!!!!! They will have to go in, and clean up Bushs' mess, and what a job that will be, getting us Trillions of dollars, out of debt, will be one MAJOR-job alone!!! Wouldn't it be crazy if noone wanted the job, because he made such a mess out of his job as President!!! Man, that would be something else!! You do know he's the most hated , I mean our country is the most hated by the world, because of him, now. .. that even the spokeman for the queen of England cant stand him, he just puts on the face, like they all do... And England used to be our "Brother" countrymen!! For them to dislike our President and the way he's running our country, is so sad !!! His term cant end quick enough for me!! And that's all I'm going to say about that!! Oh, and I just pray a Democrat makes office next term!! God knows we need someone strong and good, who's willing to do alot of hard work, cleaning up his messes, and bringing our soldier's HOME!!!! Amen? You have a Wonderful New Year, you & your's!! Smile!!! He's only got what 1 & 1/2, left... Hopefully it will speed right on by!!!

2006-12-26 00:49:32 · answer #3 · answered by Hmg♥Brd 6 · 6 1

I never did...in fact even when he originally lost in 2000 I never supported him. I still don't understand why he was even president in the first place when he lost the 2000 election and then the Supreme Courts trampled all over the Florida State Constitution by awarding GW the presidency instead of giving a full recount as the Florida State Constitution mandates. I thought we fought the Civil War for issues like that!

2006-12-26 00:38:57 · answer #4 · answered by fade_this_rally 7 · 6 2

If it wasn't for George Bush taking our troops to Iraq our freedom and our safety would have been compromised. As it was Saddam Hussein was threatening to bomb us. We where threatened so we took action. You can't blame what happens to people over there on George Bush. If there wasn't such corrupt people over there that where taught from a young age to be violent and kill , do suicide bombings than maybe it would be safer over there as well but You have not only the Muslims but the Palestinians fighting over Israel as well. So what it all comes down to it, who's side are you on The United States or the terrorists. Id rather be United States of America side.

2006-12-26 00:49:05 · answer #5 · answered by girl176a1 3 · 0 4

Well, I can see you are a bleeding heart liberal and dont know how to do math. first of all, Osama world wide, has killed more people than you can count in the name of Islam. Either directly or in-directly, he has been killing people, Americans included, since the Marine barracks was bombed.

To compare Bush to Osama, shows how much of a mental midget you really are. Would you compare Roosevelt or Ike to someone like Hitler, or Tojo because of all the deaths that occured in World War 2?

No President likes sending people to fight for freedom. People like you forget who and how many died under Bill Clinton in Somalia and Bosnia, but know to the person how many died under the leadership of Bush.

Can you remember the names of the Marines in lebanon? What about the people on flight 103 which blew up over Lockerbe Scottland?? What about those in 911 attack? Do you know their names?

American Presidents have two choices when we are attacked or a real perceived attack is pending. We can either sit back and talk about it, which is what happened from the first Gulf war to the second one, when the UN couldnt or wouldnt enforce sanctions. We now know that Annon had his fingers in the cookie jar too. The second option is fight back. You liberals would have us talk ourselves into oblivion. Had you been around during the second world war, the majority of it would be goose stepping and Saluting a Nazi leader.

Get a spine transplant and grow up. We live in a violent world and I for one, dont always agree with what ANY President does while in office, but I am glad we had a strong, God fearing one there when 911 occured and we are striking back.



Semper Fi

2006-12-26 00:47:16 · answer #6 · answered by George C 4 · 2 5

Well the US death toll in Iraq has now passed that of 9/11. But its been over 3 years while 9/11 was a one day thing.

2006-12-26 00:41:16 · answer #7 · answered by Niecy 6 · 6 1

Ever here of a biased and loaded question? There is no way to answer the contrary point of your question. But I will try.

Comparing the two is meaningless. I'm willing to bet GB was somehow responsible for the death of more Americans before we ever heard of OBL. So what? I'm sure some policy he supported or did not support was indirectly responsible for unnecessary deaths.

But I still support him less than I used to.

2006-12-26 00:38:53 · answer #8 · answered by iisj 2 · 3 3

Bush couldn't care less how many people died on, or since 9/11, he only cares about his warprofiteering.

2006-12-26 05:52:38 · answer #9 · answered by Ringo G. 4 · 2 1

Actually, the people who don't support Bush have encouraged the insurgents and terrorists to kill the Americans.

You foreigners get a little brainwashed at times.

2006-12-26 00:44:17 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 4

fedest.com, questions and answers