2006-12-26 00:10:55 · 20 answers · asked by Snowshoe 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
People ignoring the millions of Muslims who speak out against the terrorists have an agenda of devision.Ironically they don't realize they're saying the same thing as Osama,that being Muslim is to suport him.
A few examples that that claim is false.
“The undersigned, leaders of Islamic movements, are horrified by the events of Tuesday 11 September 2001 in the United States which resulted in massive killing, destruction and attack on innocent lives. We express our deepest sympathies and sorrow. We condemn, in the strongest terms, the incidents, which are against all human and Islamic norms. This is grounded in the Noble Laws of Islam which forbid all forms of attacks on innocents. God Almighty says in the Holy Qur'an: 'No bearer of burdens can bear the burden of another' (Surah al-Isra 17:15).”
MSANews, September 14, 2001
Shaykh Yusuf Qaradawi, Qatar; Tariq Bishri, Egypt; Muhammad S. Awwa, Egypt; Fahmi Huwaydi, Egypt; Haytham Khayyat, Syria; Shaykh Taha Jabir al-Alwani, U.S.:
“All Muslims ought to be united against all those who terrorize the innocents, and those who permit the killing of non-combatants without a justifiable reason. Islam has declared the spilling of blood and the destruction of property as absolute prohibitions until the Day of Judgment. ... [It is] necessary to apprehend the true perpetrators of these crimes, as well as those who aid and abet them through incitement, financing or other support. They must be brought to justice in an impartial court of law and [punished] appropriately. ... [It is] a duty of Muslims to participate in this effort with all possible means.”
The Washington Post, October 11, 2001
Shaykh Muhammed Sayyid al-Tantawi, imam of al-Azhar mosque in Cairo, Egypt:
“Attacking innocent people is not courageous, it is stupid and will be punished on the day of judgement. ... It’s not courageous to attack innocent children, women and civilians. It is courageous to protect freedom, it is courageous to defend oneself and not to attack.”
Agence France Presse, September 14, 2001
Abdel-Mo'tei Bayyoumi, al-Azhar Islamic Research Academy, Cairo, Egypt:
“There is no terrorism or a threat to civilians in jihad [religious struggle].”
Al-Ahram Weekly Online, 20 - 26 September2001
Shaykh Muhammad bin ‘Abdallah al-Sabil, member of the Council of Senior Religious Scholars, Saudi Arabia:
“Any attack on innocent people is unlawful and contrary to shari'a (Islamic law). ... Muslims must safeguard the lives, honor and property of Christians and Jews. Attacking them contradicts shari'a.”
Agence France Presse, December 4, 2001
League of Arab States:
“The General-Secretariat of the League of Arab States shares with the people and government of the United States of America the feelings of revulsion, horror and shock over the terrorist attacks that ripped through the World Trade Centre and Pentagon, inflicting heavy damage and killing and wounding thousands of many nationalities. These terrorist crimes have been viewed by the League as inadmissible and deserving all condemnation. Divergence of views between the Arabs and the United States over the latter’s foreign policy on the Middle East crisis does in no way adversely affect the common Arab attitude of compassion with the people and government of the United States at such moments of facing the menace and ruthlessness of international terrorism. In more than one statement released since the horrendous attacks, the League has also expressed deep sympathy with the families of the victims. In remarks to newsmen immediately following the tragic events, Arab League Secretary-General Amre Moussa described the feelings of the Arab world as demonstrably sympathetic with the American people, particularly with families and individuals who lost their loved ones. “It is indeed tormenting that any country or people or city anywhere in the world be the scene of such disastrous attacks,” he added. While convinced that it is both inconceivable and lamentable that such a large-scale, organised terrorist campaign take place anywhere, anytime, the League believes that the dreadful attacks against WTC and the Pentagon unveil, time and again, that the cancer of terrorism can be extensively damaging if left unchecked. It follows that there is a pressing and urgent need to combat world terrorism. In this context, an earlier call by [Egyptian] President Hosni Mubarak for convening an international conference to draw up universal accord on ways and means to eradicate this phenomenon and demonstrate international solidarity is worthy of active consideration. The Arabs have walked a large distancein the fight against cross-border terrorism by concluding in April 1998 the Arab Agreement on Combating Terrorism.”
September 17, 2001
I could go on for pages.Muslims do speak out,it's time they are heard.It's really sad for all peace loving and decent Muslims what these fanatics are doing to their religon.
2006-12-26 00:48:00 · answer #1 · answered by justgoodfolk 7 · 4⤊ 3⤋
Yes, it is true. Muslims do not generally like to openly express a point of view that terrorism is bad. They come about it in various ways but rarely in actual condemnation. Many contribute to the terrorist cause. According to the qu'ran Muslims are not to take sides against other Muslims. Of course all of this is bulls**t because in Iraq Muslims are killing each other.
2006-12-26 00:27:14 · answer #2 · answered by wunderkind 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
it extremely is a good commence. Muslims hijack 4 airplanes in u.s., crash them, killing hundreds of persons, and now there are 4 Islamic internet site that condemn the action. Now i'm no longer a Conservative Republican, i do no longer watch Fox information with the aid of fact they spin each and every thing to the main concepts-blowing, and that i do believe our cutting-edge administration that the only thank you to renounce terrorism is to kill all the terrorists. Killing terrorists in simple terms creates greater terrorists. it incredibly is like our failed conflict on drugs. Neither answer unquestionably addresses the underlying issue. yet i'll take subject with you and say that the Muslim community international, has no longer finished almost adequate to wrestle terrorist. Muslims continuously say that for the time of basic terms a fragment of a % of all Muslims are terrorists. yet that determine can not in all possibility be actual. The terrorists have an entire community of help in the Muslim community. almost each and every Mosque in the united kingdom preaches violence against the west. loss of life to u.s. is a rallying cry it extremely is heard each and every Friday in each and every Muslim usa in the worldwide. Your internet site condemnation does no longer something. you ought to renounce helping the community of terror. eliminate the imams that carry forth hate. Expel the novel thinkers. artwork collectively to unravel the issue. with the aid of fact it is not going away. and quickly we are going to all be lifeless. Rotting in the floor. with the aid of fact there's no God. there's no Allah. Jesus in no way existed. And Muhammad replaced right into a charlatan.
2016-10-06 00:52:20 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
here we go again. Now this is the Republican parties fault. Sorry, but I have yet to see any evidence of Muslims world wide taking a stance against suicide bombings ! I am also sure that the majority of them do not support it. What needs to happen is for the Muslims themselves to stand up against it. I do not see any evidence of this happening anytime soon. Unless this does happen, the shoulder of blame falls squarely on the shoulders of the entire Muslim community.
2006-12-26 00:22:44 · answer #4 · answered by meathead 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Of course many Muslims condemn terrorism. But some conservatives want to portray all Muslims as bad guys, in order to justify certain political agendas, and so lie about them, the same way they lie about Democrats being unpatriotic and marriage being "sacred" (even the conservatives who have been divorced more than once!) Luckily, many Republicans aren't this narrow-minded.
2006-12-26 00:19:02 · answer #5 · answered by Vaughn 6 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Yes, it's true. There has been no public condemnation from the Islam community regarding terrorism.
2006-12-26 00:34:49 · answer #6 · answered by The_Cricket: Thinking Pink! 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Why do they insist that there was dancing in the streets in ________ country on 9/11 when it was shown that the film was over 10 years old and they were celebrating a holiday of some sort.
They are the "Blame anyone but us" crowd.
2006-12-26 00:28:43 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
It must be all the anti terror marches that I see all over the world. Of course you come out with one controversial cartoon and watch them take to the streets. What say you?
2006-12-26 00:29:31 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
If Muslims would control the extremist elements among them then they would not have the problems they now have. We have nut Job extremists in the USA but we control them. The Unabomber is in jail, Timothy McVeigh is dead, Eric Rudolph was hunted down, captured and given life in prison, the wackos of Waco are dead. How many terrorist have the Muslims run down? ( Let me get that one for you) NONE !
2006-12-26 00:18:32 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Everyone knows that Muslims don't condemn terrorism, they glorify it (maybe not all but the majority).
Maybe they have their own problems about which we don't know.
Maybe, if we stop calling muslim nations as terrorist nations, they will 'condemn' terrorism.
But I see terrorism in other religions too.
2006-12-26 00:12:51 · answer #10 · answered by Dixie 2 · 3⤊ 3⤋
When usa condemn its state terrorism against Iraqies & Afganies
&
when israel condemn its state terrorism against Palastinians & lebanese
Then
Muslims will condemn terrorism against the west.
2006-12-26 00:36:58 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋