English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

10 answers

They are not related but both played Superman very well and both were taken from us far too soon!!

2006-12-26 00:42:12 · answer #1 · answered by mikea_va 6 · 0 0

Christopher Reeve (no "s" at the end) and George Reeves were not related biologically. They were related theatrically, however, in that they both played Superman, George in a long-running television series, Christopher in four motion pictures. George Reeves committed suicide in 1959. Christopher Reeve, who had long been paralyzed from a horse-riding injury, died in 2004.

2016-05-23 07:30:11 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I am sure there are a George and a Christopher Reeves who are related. But, if you are referring to the Superman portrayers, no, they are not. It's George Reeves, and Christopher Reeve. (Please note, no s at the end of Christophers name)

Loong Live Jambi

2006-12-25 23:00:02 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Not realated and its George Reeves and Chris Reeve, (No S)

Only commonality is having played Clark Kent/Superman and being relatively type cast as such

2006-12-26 08:21:03 · answer #4 · answered by janssen411 6 · 0 0

No, George REEVES was not related to Christopher REEVE (no "S")

2006-12-25 22:58:08 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Superman Portrayers

2016-10-18 04:54:12 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The are NOT related.

2006-12-25 22:58:04 · answer #7 · answered by WC 7 · 0 0

They are not related.

2006-12-25 22:57:38 · answer #8 · answered by lbuajlw 4 · 0 0

No, they were not related.

2006-12-25 22:57:40 · answer #9 · answered by andyrulesitall 3 · 0 0

nope

2006-12-26 00:36:13 · answer #10 · answered by kimberly b 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers