English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Sigmund Freud, Mark Twain, and me say he did.

2006-12-25 21:25:31 · 11 answers · asked by Wisdom Guru 3 in Arts & Humanities History

11 answers

Absolutely not, this myth has been perpetrated since just after Shakespeares death from the "Educated" intelligencia claiming that no low-born, without a University education, could possibly write so well. It has been thouroughly debunked, as a previous writer stated. Very odd this coming from one of my heros, and a subject of study by me; Sam Clemens. Considering HE was low born and had no formal higher education himself. I have wondered about this.As for S.Freud who cares what he thought...

2006-12-25 21:53:35 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

This just demonstrates that conspiracy theories aren’t unique to our time. Bacon didn’t write them, Shakespeare wrote them. Following is a small selection from a site and the source link will take you there for far more information.

There are enough conspiracy theories out there regarding the works of Shakespeare (or attributed to Shakespeare, if you prefer) that entire careers have been built upon positing alternate candidates for the true authorship of the works. Whether or not the claim of Shakespeare is legitimate, the burden of proof would seem to lie on those who wish to discredit the Bard. On the other hand, it's only fair to give attention to this debate as it has been ongoing since the 1700s.

Francis Bacon, Philosopher and Writer: Bacon has been a traditional favorite of the anti-Stratford camp, and retains a high place on the list of potential candidates. Bacon proponents point toward Bacon's learning, his correspondences and memoirs (most notably, his notebook, Promus), as well as ciphers and other coincidences. Although Bacon was an undisputed man of letters, his style and expression vary greatly from that of Shakespeare's works. Bacon also produced such a voluminous output of his own, it's hard to conceive of him finding spare time enough to produce the quality output of work attributed to the Bard.

2006-12-25 22:58:02 · answer #2 · answered by Randy 7 · 2 0

Maybe, maybe not. There are several theories about who wrote the works attributed to Shakespeare. Francis Bacon is one of many people that it is believed by some could have written Shakespeare's works. I don't know who really wrote them, but I think it is an interesting puzzle that might be figured out someday.

2006-12-26 03:30:52 · answer #3 · answered by V.W. 3 · 0 2

No, I think the rumors that Bacon wrote Shakespear have been refuted. There are a lot of myths out there that, when started, have momentum and become the "Truth". beware!

2006-12-25 21:37:30 · answer #4 · answered by James O only logical answer D 4 · 2 0

Shakespeare is a literary genius. His bioraphy states that he worked hours in his study room the he even neglected or did not spend much time with his wife.

2006-12-25 21:45:34 · answer #5 · answered by wilma m 6 · 1 0

sure, Shakespeare existed. he replaced right into a real person who replaced into born in Stratford, and went to London to grow to be an actor and playwright, and replaced right into a ingredient-proprietor of the Globe Theatre. he later retired to Stratford on Avon and died in 1616. he's buried interior the church there, you could bypass to his grave. there is no data by any skill that totally everyone different than Shakespeare had something to do with the writing of his performs. 1st Baron Verulam replaced into an extremely busy guy who did an excellent form of writing of his very own, he does no longer have had time to jot down all those performs. Neither could any of the people reported to have completed it. in actuality, Shakespeare's authorship of the performs is definitely attessted, he's mentioend usually via different writers, Ben Jonson as an occasion refers to him as 'the candy Swan of Avon'. And the grasp of the REvels to james i mentions him by using fact the author of performs in his information. the 1st Folio, revealed in basic terms some years after Shakespeare's dying, has his call on the e book, and his portrait. besides, that's nonsense to signify that Shakespeare had no gaining expertise of. He replaced into the son of a wealthy tradesman of Stratford on Avon, and as such probably attended the community grammar college, which replaced into time-honored prepare for boys of his classification. His performs comprise many references to faculties and schoolmasters, there is the a snigger scene interior the Merry different halves of Windsor as an occasion, the place a schoolmaster examines Mistress web site's son on his expertise. Shakespeare replaced into needless to say extremely attentive to the habitual of the grammar college. no one in Shakespeare's lifetime ever reported that he did no longer write the performs, the concept 1st Baron Verulam wrote them replaced into dreamt up greater desirable than 200 years after Shakespeare died.

2016-10-19 00:03:17 · answer #6 · answered by chowning 4 · 0 0

Oh well - you must be right then - thanks for your comprehensive list of sources that enable us all to see that you are absolute right.

Whats wrong with Shakespeare having written the works of Shakespeare ?

Aldous Huxley, Samuel Johnson, Coleridge, and me say he did.

2006-12-25 22:59:17 · answer #7 · answered by the_lipsiot 7 · 3 1

Everyone knows that Shakespeare did not write those plays. They were written by another man of the same name.

2006-12-25 21:48:33 · answer #8 · answered by iansand 7 · 1 4

fracis bacon invented bacon.

2006-12-25 22:22:16 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

www.shvoong.com/f/books/238570-shakespeare-dead
www.sirbacon.org/links/evidence.htm
www.shakespeare-oxford.com
www.math.columbia.edu/~thaddeus/honors3/logic.pdf
shakespeareauthorship.com/bacpenl.html

2006-12-25 21:40:09 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers