In JULIUS CAESAR?

Question

In Julius Caesar... What were the conspirators reasons for killing Caesar?
I understand that Brutus' reason was that he loved Rome but what about the consiprators.?
IS there more to this please help..!!!

Answer 1

I say rent the HBO series ROME

Answer 2

Cassius and the conspirators depicted Caesar as being ambitious. This is because he refused the crown offered by Marc Antony three times, he did not listen to the warnings that people gave him throughout the book, and he did not end the punishment he placed upon Metellus Cimber’s brother, Publius Cimber. These were all acts of ambition. He was also very stubborn and did not listen to reason. This is ambitious because he would always feel that he was right and no one else was. This is what tyrants do, and he would have also. Caesar was ambitious because he refused a crown that he felt was not good enough for him, did not listen to warnings from people, and would not back down from his decision to banish Publius. Because he did all these things, it revealed the things that he would do if he were to become king. If Caesar had become king, he would have ruled the Romans like a tyrant.

Answer 3

One of the things that isn't always apparent in today's theater is that everyone knows the story and everyone knows how it ends. It was the same for the Greek plays... The same for opera, and the same for Julius Caesar. Since we are not that close to classical Theater, it is not common knowledge today that good ol' Julius declared himself a living god and claimed that Apollo was his birth father which gave him the authority to disregard the democratic process and ignore the senate. He was quite ruthless. Burtus loved Caesar, but loved his country more and felt that the end of Caesar might stop the decline of the Roman empire. Most people came to the theater with that knowledge so the narrative to provide background information was not necessary as part of the script.

Answer 4

nicely, in Rome, long term in the past, human beings had 3 names to designate them: a million- the praenomen (or first call, the only entering into the previous the nomen). for that reason, the praenomen in Gaius. in spite of the incontrovertible fact that it replaced into written Caius! and stated Gaius. 2- the nomen, which for that reason is Julius, through fact Caesar replaced into from the Julii kinfolk. So it replaced right into a kinfolk call. 3- the cognomen, is purely approximately like a surname, a nickname. for that reason Caesar. So this is Caius Julius Caesar (stated Gaius Julius Caesar) who replaced into the same and purely Julius Caesar, the only which conquered the Gauls and wrote the Commentarii de bello Gallico, or comments with reference to the Gallic conflict. Historians hence can decide on between Julius Caesar, Caesar, and Gaius Julius Caesar, or maybe Caius Julius Caesar. ineffective to declare, the guy replaced the entire international, like Alexander the large, like Cyrus the large, and unlike each and every of the others, in spite of in the event that they opt to pretend marking their time in any way.

Answer 5

Brutus did it because Cassius made him think about Caesar as a evil dictator, and that he will harm the Roman Empire which Brutus loved the most.... everybody else were blinded by Cassius as well and most of them, as Cassius himself, wanted power...

Answer 6

He would always kill people if they did not love him! He was not a nice guy and he would paint ppl yellow and make them sufficate within the paint. Plus he woulkd dig a hole and put ppls bodies in and trim their heads off like grass. take it from a 7th grader

Answer 7

It's a pretty good play; you ought to give it a read sometime.