Which are the lesser of two evils? Ladies answers preferred.?

Question

I have asked these before but a few people enjoyed it last time so I am doing it again.

We have a radio station where celebraties are interviewed and asked to choose the lesser of two evils. Here are a few for you to try:

If you had to loose a leg or an arm what would you choose?
If you had to be blind or deaf what would you choose?
If you had to cover your nose with someones used underwear would it be a guys or a girls?
If you had to choose between being the ugliest person in the world or the poorest which would you choose?

I look forward to your responses and will give the best explinations the 10 points!

Answer 1

(1) I would lose a leg because I work with my hands everyday. Specifically, I work with people who have experienced hand injuries. I see the loss they feel everyday, and I cannot imagine being unable to use one of my hands for all of my everyday tasks: like buttoning clothing, washing dishes, shaking hands, or wrapping my arms around someone to give them a hug. I would much rather deal with the loss of a leg because it is much easier to compensate for its loss with the use of crutches or a prosthetic leg.

(2) I would much rather be blind because I would not want to deal with the loss of hearing music, singing, or communicating with people one-on-one without the use of an interpreter. Deafness seems so isolating. Verbal communication is so essential to so much of what we do that I cannot imagine living without the ability to freely communicate...even if if means communicating without the use of my eyes.

(3) I would cover my nose with girl's underwear. It's more of a hygene issue than anything else. From personal experience, I can tell you that a girl's underwear is much cleaner than a guy's. This is probably because girls tend to wear panty shields and they whipe themselves better after using the toilet. However, if the underwear was only "used" for a few seconds right after the person got out of the shower, the underwear of either gender would be equally easy to take. :-)

(4) I would rather be the uglyest than poorest. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, and what may be ugly to one person could be beautiful to someone else. An ugly person who is confident and giving can do a lot in this world. However, it would be nice to have a little money. It doesn't have to be a fortune, and I wouldn't have to be the richest person in the world. Money can do a lot of good if it is used right. So the short answer is that I would like to be ugly but have a little money!

Answer 2

If you had to loose a leg or an arm what would you choose? A leg, I need both hands

If you had to be blind or deaf what would you choose? Blind, I'd want to hear my daughters laughter always

If you had to cover your nose with someones used underwear would it be a guys or a girls? A girls. LOL

If you had to choose between being the ugliest person in the world or the poorest which would you choose? Poorest...I already don't have alot so it wouldn't be a stretch.

Answer 3

-If you had to loose a leg or an arm what would you choose?
Probably leg
-If you had to be blind or deaf what would you choose?
Blind. Cause I love to sing. :)
-If you had to cover your nose with someones used underwear would it be a guys or a girls? So gross...Probably a gay guys. They are so much cleaner. (Not intended to be mean here folks. Just an observation)
-If you had to choose between being the ugliest person in the world or the poorest which would you choose? Poorest. I agree with what someone else said, I'm already close to poor. So not a far stretch.

Answer 4

if i had to loose a arm or a leg it would be my leg you could still get around with a prostectic leg .i would choose being deaf would like to keep my eyes to see my children grow up and the underwear thing really dosent matter which one gross no matter what i would rather be the ugliest than the poorest if im rich well i could fix my looks.

Answer 5

lose a leg or an arm - an arm
blind or deaf - blind
guys or girls used underwear - a guy's
ugliest or poorest person in the world - poor

Answer 6

I would choose to lose an leg. I'm somewhat of an artist, and I need my hands, and although I have great legs, my chosen profession requires arms.

I would choose to be deaf for the same reason above.

I would chose to cover with women's underwear because I have two brothers, and they've both gone days without changing their underwear.

I would choose to be poor; you can recover from being poor. For example "The Pursuit of Happiness." Besides studies show that the more attractive you are the more you are accepted.

Answer 7

Arm, I need legs to walk. I don't want to hop around. Been on crutches before, no fun.
Deaf, I am partially deaf now.
Woo, I have seen some guys' underwear, it would have to be women's.--Gawd, can I pick 'em though?
Not rich here, told I'm easy on the eye's, so poor.

Answer 8

An arm
Blind
A guy's
the poorest

Answer 9

leg--I could still type fast....
deaf--I cannot imagine not seeing
girls--b/c we're usually a bit more hygenic!!
poorest b/c you could always move on up

Answer 10

why not both
cannot choose
neither
poorest