if u like tomb raider
try prince of persia series
2006-12-25 15:03:52
·
answer #1
·
answered by AndrU 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
"If the total amount of mass-energy is limited, and the amount of usable energy is decreasing, then the universe cannot have existed forever, otherwise it would already have exhausted all usable energy the heat death of the universe." Mass-energy may be limited, and the amount of USABLE energy may be decreasing, but that does not necessarily signify the end of the universe caused by the lack of energy to do work. The amount of energy remains the same. Total equilibrium of energy or "heat" in the universe does not mean the energy ceases to exist. It means that all things that require work as a function of energy to exist can no longer exist. However, the total amount of mass-energy will remain the same. You can state will absolute assurance that the universe has a beginning, only if you have absolute proof that the universe has an end. "The universe requires a cause because it had a beginning" Can we be absolutely sure that the universe had a beginning? If it has no end it has no beginning. Therefore it could have always existed. If "God" does not need a cause because He always existed, then why would a universe need a cause if it has always existed? How can we not be sure that the universe will not exist eternally in a state of equilibrium? What if the universe was not created for the purpose of human beings? "Also, the universe cannot be self-caused nothing can create itself, because that would mean that it existed before it came into existence, which is a logical absurdity." I agree with you there. Of course, a cause cannot be caused by itself. This is valid logic. On the other hand I do have one ponderous thought about time and God. If he caused the universes' beginning, he is a cause. Therefore, would he not be able to produce both cause and effects at His will? Time, like you've stated, "Einstein's general relativity, which has much experimental support, shows that time is linked to matter and space.", is a rate of change. However, I believe that time is a product of any type of change. Or cause and effect. Therefore, would God not be living in his own time? Whether it be constantly varying in speed or not. As he is acting or changing time passes as an effect. Time will not exist only when absolutely nothing exists, including God. However, I am not stating with for a fact that there is not a beginning to the universe. I am simply using logic to seek the truth. However, like all humans I make mistakes because I do not know everything. I am simply using my understanding of what I "know" to produce logical explanations. Maybe there is information out there that proves the universe did begin at a certain instant and that all things in it followed. This is a very interesting question. I like that you used logic to support your argument. That is how it should be done. And don't get me wrong. I'm not trying to disprove you here. I want the same thing you want. The truth. I have questions and I am simply trying to find the answer.
2016-05-23 06:53:26
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
ahh tomb raider,a nice game,but it seems rather overrated if you know what i mean,lol.its not very hard to convice alot of gamers to like the game with alot of sex appeal.it took rather big fall when it came to watching its timeline...it was like it started off good,then went great,then took a big sink..then is trying redepmt itself by adding more "eye candy"and a better story line,with new things added,legends was a pretty nice game,the annaversary is more of like a milking idea,lol.but all and all i think its done quite well with getting back on its two feet :D,cant really say so much for the movies....-_- terrible..putting a extremly good looking women to act in a ok story line...ehh doenst work out quite well..
in conclusion.....very good game,but not greatest.with that whole female wonder women slinging guns idea.all the down hill things they did with the franchise,didnt help it so much.but i sitll go my love for lara croft :D
2006-12-29 01:22:32
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
i know that tomb raider is good but personally i did not have the time to explore the game properly.
If possible, pls send me the system requirements and the brief review of the game.
2006-12-25 15:20:18
·
answer #4
·
answered by Ricky2cool 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I like tomb raider!!! I heard that a new tomb raider game is coming out in 2007: Tomb Raider Anniversary! I'll definitely buy it. If you want the walkthrough for any tomb raider games, check out the links below!
-Tomb Raider: http://www.tombraiderchronicles.com/tr1/walkthrough/index.html
-Tomb Raider II: http://www.tombraiderchronicles.com/tr2/walkthrough/index.html
-Tomb Raider III: http://www.tombraiderchronicles.com/tr3/walkthrough/index.html
-The Last Revelation: http://www.tombraiderchronicles.com/tr4/walkthrough/index.html
-Tomb Raider Chronicles: http://www.tombraiderchronicles.com/tr5/walkthrough/index.html
-The Angel of Darkness: http://www.tombraiderchronicles.com/tng/walkthrough/index.html
-Tomb Raider Legend: http://www.tombraiderchronicles.com/tr7/walkthrough/index.html
2006-12-25 16:19:19
·
answer #5
·
answered by Yuyu 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
even i play tomb rider it is the very very nice game of ever . all the best for you to continue playing
2006-12-26 15:58:55
·
answer #6
·
answered by imran 2
·
0⤊
0⤋