How do You believe war should be fought?

Question

All out?, or, in a politically correct, can't kill any civilians, We are so morally superior way? I say, crush them like a roach.

Cork- I mean when we enter a war, fight it to win. All Out. Whatever it takes. If it is worth going to war, and getting people killed, it should be worth the entire effort of our military, to secure a victory. I don't give a Crap about saving feelings, or winning the hearts of people who hate America to begin with.

answer man- I can only thank God, that people with your mentality were not fighting world war 11.

RKo- LOL, Are You really that ignorant? The Bible also said, "There is a time for war, and a time for peace." The Bible is filled with examples where Gods people had to fight, with Gods approval.

Nature Freaky- Actually, we are at war with civilians, in this conflict.Did You know that at least 50 percent of Muslims admire Bin Laden? The same thugs that are blowing up our troops, are walking around among the Iraqi population, as civilians. I am not against your point totally. However, a line needs to be drawn in the sand. A ultimatum. Once delivered, and given the chance, annihilate them.

Nature freaky- I also know there are many Kind decent people in Iraq, who just want to live in peace. My heart goes out to them. The problem is that as things are going now, We can only win this conflict the way I described. They have had their chance. They had their opportunity to report the enemy. They are responsible for their own fate now. We delivered them from a evil dictator.If they are unwilling to help us, then let them rot. It is not our responsibility to deliver them from there troubles. They choose them, by not reporting the scum among them.

I do not believe nuking Iraq is the answer. Just fight it all out, and be done with it.
Iran? Maybe, if that is what it takes to stop the upcoming Hitler. Stop him, or he will stop YOU. If the situtation were reversed, and the U.S. had no atomic weapons, and Iran had our technology, Do You think as a U.S.Citizen, You would even exist right now? You would be ash in the atmosphere.

Answer 1

We are the Rockey Balboa's of this planet, we've got what it takes to win a war

Iraq is like Pauly (assuming you've seen the Rocky series)

And yet we're pussyfooting around them in fear because the libs continually say we can't win. They are destroying this country like we should be destroying Iraq

What happened to the good old days when we actually had the guts to win a war? The left, thats what happened!

And they wont even go fight. How often do you hear them say "why don't the neocons go fight in Bush's war?"

Well folks, this is America's war, not just Bush's war, and 80% of the military votes Republican anyway. The libs love to abuse their freedom. How bought they fight for it for once?

Answer 2

First of all, there are many types of fighting. War has to be fought AS a war. A war is a conflict between two or more groups that involve large numbers of individuals. We are not at war with civilians. In the side lines we need these civilians. History shows that the non military people can be very helpful to those in conflict against their fellow countrymen. In this case we need them to take over our fighting. These civilians must group and use whatever they have to over power thier irrational countrymem, if even just to protest. As for morally supior, crushing them like a roach isn't real morally correct. In the very end it will not be fighting that settles this. It will be talking. Without that final treaty there are several options to war. A ruthless dictator has ordered EVERY one on the weaker oposing side, dead, including those who may have helped. OR the battles will never end, even if they stop for years, it would start up again. OR The stronger more powerful side just quits and goes home with nothing actually settled, leaving a good 99.99% chance that it will start again anyway. But it will be that END AGREEMENT that settles it, not total anialation.

Answer 3

nonviolently!

you know, it would be funny to elect a group of people to go fight from each country. seriously, open it up to the voting population in a referendum. you could be completely politically incorrect, send the whites or the blacks or the hispanics. and i think none of that will matter and the people will send the politicans into war by a write in campaign.

if you are going to be the one to decide whether a nation should go to war, you should be directly responsible for contributing to the effort. not hanging out in the comfort of your office that is outfitted by perks you got from abramoff lol

Answer 4

First get the media the hell out of there. Second let the military run the war and then politicians can run the government! Win it decisively! Maybe they should ask the men on the ground what needs to be done!

Answer 5

Robots...either that or have leaders duke it out in the ring. Put it on pay per view...! Send rich kids off to war; not poor and see how quickly wars end.

Answer 6

Couldnt we just settle it over a pint and a hand of cards or even a game of chess??? that would be so much better for the people in the world!

Answer 7

how about we arm the top politicians from each of the feuding countries and let them do the fighting. Imagine how much less war there would be if those people had to make that sacrifice!

Answer 8

All out, the civilians should know better to stay clear, if they get in the way its their problem.

Oh yeah and keep the media out, they do more damage than good.

Answer 9

Let the politicians do the fighting for a change.

Answer 10

I dont really like to talk in specific detail about how I think a war should be fought.