First of all, the liberals are well known for courting special interest groups and Rosie is well known to be anti Bush and ...well...you know. Im just curious if the real reason why Rosie has never come out in support of Ms.Pelosi is it would give that family values thing that was trumpeted in the Clinton elections a whole new spin. Also the feud with the Donald was on top of the news and she couldve used the public support which Ms. Pelosi could offer. The idea of not wanting to rock the boat has some merit but I just wonder if the reason why would be the conclusion drawn by lots of people. I for one, would truly like to see how good Nancy really is at Clintonspeak and that surely would be the ultimate challenge. One could also make the argument as well that it would explain alot of the peculiar power grab behavior of Ms. Pelosi as well. In all fairness to Ms Pelosi the assumption...MAY...not be correct, but given the Clintons destruction of Billy Dale would truth really matter?
2006-12-25 13:29:59 · 14 answers · asked by koalatcomics 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
and by the way i thank the soldiers in iraq by recognizing the lunacy of the liberal movement that impedes their cause of maintaining freedom from attack by al qaeda domestically.
2006-12-25 13:45:19 · update #1
and the peculiar behavior refers to pre election telling people iraq was her agenda and post election telling people that she and mr. reid supported the bush raise of troop level in iraq and her top agenda item was the power grab...remember her words not just mine and public on 60 minutes.
2006-12-25 13:47:10 · update #2
p.s. sorry liberals, lots of gay/bi are married with children..that means absolutely nothing.
2006-12-25 13:48:01 · update #3
I would make an assumption she will do anything for a vote in her district.
2006-12-25 14:16:20 · answer #1 · answered by JudiBug 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
It's not that important what type of "lifestyle" assumption people make about Nancy, and who cares? For one thing, homosexuality is NOT a lifestyle, unless of course you want to call heterosexuality by the same term, and I never hear it called that. Secondly, I think Rosie O'Donnell has more important things to think about right now than supporting Nancy Pelosi, such as raising her children and showing up to film "the View" every day. Seems to me like you are spending too much time in front of the boob tube. All this inconsequential stuff passes, you know.
2006-12-25 13:41:14 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Yes
2006-12-25 13:31:03 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Definitely
2006-12-25 13:31:39 · answer #4 · answered by Raine 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Nancy Pelosi is married with children.
The "peculiar power grab behavior of Ms. Pelosi" is, uh, she won!
Why should Nancy Pelosi interfere and take sides in a celebrity spat between Trump and Rosie?
2006-12-25 13:44:06 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
Rosie supports our President Bush's war efforts in Iraq. She is on board.
2006-12-25 13:37:34 · answer #6 · answered by Timothy M 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
She is much extra of a communist than Obama. She is inebriated on her very own skill and would not care a ingredient with regard to the working human beings. i think of she could look good in a coat of tar and feathers. yet we actually won't be ready to assume too lots of her. After her,she's from San Fagcisco
2016-11-23 17:08:42 · answer #7 · answered by lucy 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I resent the implication that liberals are the only party that thrive on special interest money. The entire government on every level has been corrupted by special interest money.
2006-12-25 13:48:52 · answer #8 · answered by Fortytipper 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
First of all, I would be surprised if she did not go to a function that Pelosi put on. Their politics are identical.
2006-12-25 13:32:21 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
Yes, people love to make assumptions, its just good television.
2006-12-25 13:36:28 · answer #10 · answered by Matthew b 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋