hairless
2006-12-25 12:51:23
·
answer #1
·
answered by Johnny Q. 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Personally,Hairless,or trimmed...If a female and male have sex,of course they'll be naked and there...U know,public areas will be close 2 eachother,and if it is very hairy,it can form crabs.Its like lice,but on,"down there"...That should be the only thing a male and female should be concidered though...Thats why ladies either trim,or shave...
2006-12-25 21:18:55
·
answer #2
·
answered by Nikki 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
doesnt matter too much to me. just at long as theres nothing growing and she didnt leave left overs down there. i think they should be maintained and trimmed. hairless is ok too. better heigne. had both eaten both only liked one enough to do it again.
2006-12-25 20:55:00
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
hairless is the best. guys who say it doesnt matter are just saying that because they are single. and will take anything.
2006-12-25 20:57:09
·
answer #4
·
answered by askmike 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
hairless
2006-12-26 07:47:49
·
answer #5
·
answered by justme 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
hairless
2006-12-25 21:15:11
·
answer #6
·
answered by wantbecomeapad 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
both as long as they are not like a nasty bush
each guy has their own opinion though.
I like eating them, so they need to be at least maintained, or else I will literally get disgusted and walk away from it..lol
2006-12-25 20:51:58
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hairless.
Ask yourself: Would you eat a baked dinner if there was hair all over it?
No, you wouldn't. Same principal applies here.
2006-12-25 20:53:00
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Trimmed.
Hardwood makes me feel like a pedophile, and Wookie-bushed is too old school.
2006-12-25 20:51:37
·
answer #9
·
answered by JaMoke 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
I enjoy a full mound of hair !
2006-12-27 11:02:44
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋