English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-12-25 12:24:20 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports Wrestling

And give an explanation

2006-12-25 13:05:33 · update #1

15 answers

Bret...his work rate with the belt was greater when he was the
champion as opposed to Shawn. Shawn had to forfeit his title
less than a year after he won the belt, proving he wasn't up to
the challenge. Shawn is the more flamboyant wrestler, and is
better on the microphone than Bret. Shawn's politics with the WWE, and the Kliq specifially is another thing that works against his favor. He doesn't have to worry about anything as long as he
and Triple H (Vince McMahon's son-in-law) are on good terms,
and Triple H is on good terms with the McMahons, especially
Vince and Stephanie.

2006-12-25 13:59:46 · answer #1 · answered by Answerer17 6 · 2 0

Bret Hart

2006-12-25 12:32:45 · answer #2 · answered by Tweet 5 · 2 0

Bret Hart.

2006-12-25 12:34:06 · answer #3 · answered by ironchain15 6 · 1 1

Shawn Michaels

2006-12-25 12:31:51 · answer #4 · answered by jo_jo_baby2004 4 · 0 2

Bret Hart way better

2006-12-25 12:37:27 · answer #5 · answered by ubuntu 2 · 1 1

Without question Bret.

2006-12-25 12:27:04 · answer #6 · answered by Anthony M 4 · 1 1

Bret Hart, because I'm Canadian.

2006-12-25 12:26:39 · answer #7 · answered by linda c 5 · 2 1

shawn michaels

2006-12-25 13:00:27 · answer #8 · answered by jamaican babe 7 · 1 1

The best there is..the best there was...the best there will be. BRET "the hitman" HART!

2006-12-25 12:35:35 · answer #9 · answered by Big "D" 3 · 1 1

shawn michaels

2006-12-25 12:25:24 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers