English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Could it be that the criteria for an impeachment is beyond their comprehension level?

2006-12-25 12:16:33 · 16 answers · asked by Sicko 1 in Politics & Government Politics

Why do some people not understand the meaning of CRITERIA!!

2006-12-25 12:23:45 · update #1

16 answers

There is no constitutional basis for any impeachment hearings of George W. Bush

2006-12-25 12:20:07 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 7

If I did not have sexual relations with that woman is grounds for impeachment maybe the unnecessary deaths of 3000 Americans and 655,000 Iraqi should be also. The war was based on lies told by George W. Bush and his cabinet to congress, there is some proof that this war was started by Bush for his own personal gain. Which is illegal. He has broken both American laws by disregarding the constitution and international law by his authorization of treatment of prisoners. He should be impeached and then turned over to an international tribunal to be tried for his war crimes. Just because you do not see it does not mean that 70% of the American people and over 90% of people world wide are wrong.

2006-12-25 20:43:30 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

I haven't seen such calls, but if I had I would have asked those who called for the president's impeachment to provide me with a litany, chapter and verse, of those acts or omissions of the president that they regarded (and their reasons for so regarding them) as "treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors" within the meaning of Article II, Section 4, of the United States Constitution, which provides, in part, as follows:

"Section 4. The President, Vice President and all other civil officers of the United States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors."

2006-12-25 20:49:08 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

Maybe some of you should investigate a little more he has committed impeachable offences, maybe you should check things out first.

2006-12-25 21:20:03 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Yes, absolutely right you are.And they are morons too.I am not totally thrilled with GWB but there are NO grounds for impeachment other than the fact that their dreams are full of conspiracy theories and they just plain don not like his policies.They are not a very intelligent bunch!!!!

2006-12-25 20:21:11 · answer #5 · answered by Mr Bellows 5 · 1 4

I have to ad mitt I was wrong about "w" I predicted he would set this country back 10 years in reality it's more like 20 years.

2006-12-25 20:20:49 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4 2

cause maybe most people realize we were lied to about iraq he has pretty much set aside the constitution and is having people held in jail indefinetly without as much allowing them to have their day in court he is sneaky and to be honest the man disgusts me

2006-12-25 20:23:02 · answer #7 · answered by jay1026812004 2 · 4 1

Because some of us refuse to be led around like sheep. We don't 'follow the crowd' simply because others do. Maybe we can see further than the tip of our noses.


1. Violating the United Nations Charter by launching an illegal "War of Aggression" against Iraq without cause, using fraud to sell the war to Congress and the public, misusing government funds to begin bombing without Congressional authorization, and subjecting our military personnel to unnecessary harm, debilitating injuries, and deaths.

2. Violating U.S. and international law by authorizing the torture of thousands of captives, resulting in dozens of deaths, and keeping prisoners hidden from the International Committee of the Red Cross.

3. Violating the Constitution by arbitrarily detaining Americans, legal residents, and non-Americans, without due process, without charge, and without access to counsel.

4. Violating the Geneva Conventions by targeting civilians, journalists, hospitals, and ambulances, and using illegal weapons, including white phosphorous, depleted uranium, and a new type of napalm.

5. Violating U.S. law and the Constitution through widespread wiretapping of the phone calls and emails of Americans without a warrant.

6. Violating the Constitution by using "signing statements" to defy hundreds of laws passed by Congress.

7. Violating U.S. and state law by obstructing honest elections in 2000, 2002, 2004, and 2006.

8. Violating U.S. law by using paid propaganda and disinformation, selectively and misleadingly leaking classified information, and exposing the identity of a covert CIA operative working on sensitive WMD proliferation for political retribution.

9. Subverting the Constitution and abusing Presidential power by asserting a "Unitary Executive Theory" giving unlimited powers to the President, by obstructing efforts by Congress and the Courts to review and restrict Presidential actions, and by promoting and signing legislation negating the Bill of Rights and the Writ of Habeas Corpus.

10. Gross negligence in failing to assist New Orleans residents after Hurricane Katrina, in ignoring urgent warnings of an Al Qaeda attack prior to Sept. 11, 2001, and in increasing air pollution causing global warming.

11. Failure to uphold the Presidential Oath to protect, preserve and defend the Constitution of the United States:

The oath to be taken by the president on first entering office is specified in Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution:

I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States.

2006-12-25 20:35:04 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 5 2

Because liberals lost two elections they feel they were entitled to win. They have gotten worse and worse.

2006-12-25 23:47:35 · answer #9 · answered by Chainsaw 6 · 1 2

Well what it comes down to is that those people just dont like him. Because of their experience at their jobs they figure that you can always get someone fired if you dont like them and you ***** about it enough.

2006-12-25 20:29:30 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

fedest.com, questions and answers