English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

. Violating the United Nations Charter by launching an illegal "War of Aggression" against Iraq without cause, using fraud to sell the war to Congress and the public, misusing government funds to begin bombing without Congressional authorization, and subjecting our military personnel to unnecessary harm, debilitating injuries, and deaths.

2. Violating U.S. and international law by authorizing the torture of thousands of captives, resulting in dozens of deaths, and keeping prisoners hidden from the International Committee of the Red Cross.

3. Violating the Constitution by arbitrarily detaining Americans, legal residents, and non-Americans, without due process, without charge, and without access to counsel.

4. Violating the Geneva Conventions by targeting civilians, journalists, hospitals, and ambulances, and using illegal weapons, including white phosphorous, depleted uranium, and a new type of napalm.

5. Violating U.S. law and the Constitution through widespread wiretapping of the phone calls and emails of Americans without a warrant.

6. Violating the Constitution by using "signing statements" to defy hundreds of laws passed by Congress.

7. Violating U.S. and state law by obstructing honest elections in 2000, 2002, 2004, and 2006.

8. Violating U.S. law by using paid propaganda and disinformation, selectively and misleadingly leaking classified information, and exposing the identity of a covert CIA operative working on sensitive WMD proliferation for political retribution.

9. Subverting the Constitution and abusing Presidential power by asserting a "Unitary Executive Theory" giving unlimited powers to the President, by obstructing efforts by Congress and the Courts to review and restrict Presidential actions, and by promoting and signing legislation negating the Bill of Rights and the Writ of Habeas Corpus.

10. Gross negligence in failing to assist New Orleans residents after Hurricane Katrina, in ignoring urgent warnings of an Al Qaeda attack prior to Sept. 11, 2001, and in increasing air pollution causing global warming.

2006-12-25 12:10:15 · 19 answers · asked by dstr 6 in Politics & Government Politics

I DID THIS MAINLY FOR WHO SAY BUSH HAS NOT DONE ANYTHING WRONG.

2006-12-25 12:14:07 · update #1

Jungleroy
YOU ARE 100% PERCENT WRONG IN EVERYTHING YOU JUST TYPED..YOU ARE UNIFORMED AND WILL REMAIN SO ,I GUESS, ALL OF YOUR LIFE.

2006-12-25 12:22:19 · update #2

sjsosulli...
YOU ARE A SILLY BOY..THIS IS ALL A KNOWN FACT IF ONLY YOU GUYS WOULD BOTHER TO DO REAL RESEARCH

2006-12-25 12:24:23 · update #3

dispatche...
YES I AM A VIET NAM VET WHO IS SICK OF BUSH AND HIS SUPPORTERS

2006-12-25 12:25:42 · update #4

farkas419
you too are wrong in everything you said, in as far as air pollution goes and the legalities involved... read the headlines, the epa is being sued in several states right now.

2006-12-25 12:33:18 · update #5

19 answers

1. Wrong. It's not illegal if Congress approves it, and it's not a lie if there's evidence that there had been WMD's.
2. Speculation. Many of the prisoners were treated much better than our people would have been in the same position, and there's no proof that any death resulted directly from our actions.
3. Lincoln and FDR did the same thing. Would you like for them to have been impeached as well? Things are different in times of war. That's just the way it is.
4. Those areas would not have been targeted if there had not been terrorists in their midst.
5. This has ALSO been done before, although not on as large a scale. There is nowhere in the Constitution that we are guaranteed our "right to privacy" in times of war.
6. EVERY president uses "signing statements." They aren't unconstitutional. It just so happens that Bush used them the most.
7. Quit watching Fahrenheit 9/11. This has not been proven.
8. I call bull. There is no proof of any misinformation given to the media, although I'm sure some information has been withheld. That would be the job of the press secretary. Furthermore, the so-called CIA "leak" was NOT of a covert operative. Plame was not covert at the time that her identity was revealed.
9. This has also been done before, in times of war.
10. Hurricane Katrina had NOTHING to do with President Bush.
There was no specific warning (of 9/11), except that Al Qaeda was planning an attack. The PDB, which is trumpeted as being specific warning, was not. It was a rehash of things that Bin Laden had already done. That's it.
And "global warming" cannot be blamed on President Bush. Can we blame the ice age scare of the 70s on Bush too? Even if there IS global warming, and it's not just the Earth's natural cycle, it didn't start in January 2001. It started during the industrial age. Was Bush even alive then? Or can you find a way to blame him even if he wasn't?

2006-12-25 12:27:18 · answer #1 · answered by The_Cricket: Thinking Pink! 7 · 5 3

a million. A president would not want congress' o.k. to apply the militia, this is why we call the president "the commander in chief." Intel reported there grew to become into reason to make a preemptive strike (Dems theory so too). 2. the militia operates with a distinctive set of criminal rules. 3. i do unlike human beings detained at no value, with none date of charge and so on. yet accumulated data must be in place. we are doing what we are in a position to to be extra suitable than our historic previous (jap camps, remember?). 4. rules of engagement are clearer than what you think of. i think of incidental is distinctive than concentrated. 5. while you're turning out to be communiqué from a terrorist group, I constructive assume you to describe why. My telephone isn't tapped, i don't get calls from people who desire to do mass homicide in my usa. 6. Too obscure. 7. provide me a destroy, if the terrific suited particularly have been doing this, do you think of for a 2nd that the congress could be packed with DEMs precise now? Use your logic. 8. ?????? extra ambiguity. did no longer divulge the CIA op. 9. maximum of this ingredient is basically out of the left field. ask your self whether the president had finished authority over all, could you be allowed to speak approximately this? And 2nd as much as now could be your ingredient #3. 10. If a president swoops in and takes administration, subverting the administration of the state, then you certainly'll have a real subject. word how little lawsuits you hear from Ala, pass over, Fla approximately Katrina reaction? this is because of the fact those states acted "positioned up-haste," in soliciting for by suited channels, the federal government to assist. l. a.. did no longer. playstation if there have been something to question, wager your backside dollar they had be doing it already!

2016-11-23 17:02:24 · answer #2 · answered by phegley 4 · 0 0

The only thing Bush is really guilty of is bad leadership. And. had the Democrats fielded a better candidate than Kerry for the last election, we probably wouldn't be in half the mess we're in today.
The problem with liberals is that they have taken one too many steps to the left and lost focus on their core issues. Liberals need to take a step or two to the right so the moderates can hear them again.
You should stop thrashing Bush. Most every one agrees he has created a mess, Iraq shouldn't have been invaded, and he has wasted a great deal of our money. We need to focus on a solution. And beating each other up won't solve anything.

2006-12-25 12:36:59 · answer #3 · answered by Overt Operative 6 · 0 2

You are right, however until people stop being closed minded and actually open their minds a little bit Bush will continue to do nothing wrong in their eyes no matter how you lay it out for them. It is interesting to see people who had complained about Clinton and how he was going to ruin and take over the country support a President that has done just that.

2006-12-25 15:19:18 · answer #4 · answered by j 4 · 0 1

There are no reasons to answer the question (no crimes committed), and your list consist on inaccurate accusations and opinions. Remember congress voted on most of the things you listed and the democratic leadership in Louisiana failed, not Bush. The CIA leak actually was blamed on Rove and we now know that it was a democrat that leaked that info. Signing statement have been used by all past presidents. Terrorists have no rights and should not be protected under the constitution of the United States. And the Geneva Convention rules have never been followed by the enemy and the US must fight to win. Because Clinton was impeached on perjury does not Bush has to be impeached on made up lies. Also air pollution was not created overnight and blaming Bush is just a cop out.

2006-12-25 12:19:45 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 7 4

Their is no proof that air pollution is causing global warming. The planet has only warmed 1degree in 100 years. So what? What caused the global warming from the last ice age? Cow farts? In the 70's, "they" were saying that we were headed for another ice age due to pollution. You can't have it both ways. Get a life. The planet has gone through 1000's of these cycles over billions of years. We can't even make it rain in small cities when their is a drought, but we can warm the entire planet. Yea sure. duh!

2006-12-25 12:20:05 · answer #6 · answered by brokylm3 1 · 4 2

Nancy Pelosi has said she opposed the impeachment of the President, as has her counterpart in the Senate. So, I hate to break it to you, so long after the press conference; but, it ain't happenin'.

And, after reading your tirade, I think you may need to put yourself in check for spreading what may quite possibly amount to slander and libel, since this is considered print media. The kinds of allegations you're leveling cannot be made without hard legal proof. If you have it, provide the source data. I can hook you up with an excellent lawyer, so you can press charges, so long as your proof is sound.

2006-12-25 12:21:56 · answer #7 · answered by sjsosullivan 5 · 2 4

Hello john kerry
We never signed the Geneva convention, the UN has no control over nations with constitutionally recognized rights, and you are way out on a limb with all of your assumptions.
Grow up, and learn to properly site your material.
Sincerely, Jungleroy

2006-12-25 12:18:44 · answer #8 · answered by Jungleroy 4 · 6 4

Where there is one G W Bush their are bound to be many others. The future is a long time.

2006-12-25 12:13:41 · answer #9 · answered by kicking_back 5 · 0 3

There Are Alost Of Reasens. But I But Would Be Here All Night

2006-12-25 12:14:36 · answer #10 · answered by mks 7-15-02 6 · 3 4

fedest.com, questions and answers