2006-12-25 11:45:51 · 17 answers · asked by Skidude 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
If they have self control, they wouldn't have to kill babies.
It's funny how all the pro-killers are pre-judging that it's people in poverty that get the abortions....every woman I know that's had an abortion, did it because they were embarrassed that they were stupid enough or careless enough to get pregnant.
Everyone is into saving the environment, it's just that hedonists don't want to be responsible.
2006-12-25 14:43:47 · answer #1 · answered by megmom 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
The things that get aborted are, unfortunately, not "babies." They're non-comprehending masses of cells - kind of like trees, ha - that, even if not aborted, would still have a good 50 percent chance of being miscarried or stillborn and another 50 percent chance of being born into a poverty-stricken family who raises it hungry and abused.
So let's keep destroying the thing that sustains us - the earth - and _continue overpopulating_ it by banning abortion until we don't have enough fertile soil left to feed everyone! Great!
And, without the tree-savers, conservatives' destroyed environment will kill off all the babies - if not the whole human race - in the not-so-distant future anyway. You should thank us for trying to prevent conservative selfishness and short-sightedness.
You're welcome.
2006-12-25 12:05:54 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 0⤋
the basic idea is that the earth, which is by the way, responsible for our existance deserves some respect. and that a woman should have the choice wether to get an abortion or not, because if abortions were outlawed, then women would have to get illegal ones done on the street instead of in a safe, sanitary hospital with professional doctors.
correct me if i'm wrong, but look at the big picture, if we kill the trees that provide us with oxygen, there is a good chance that we wont survive either.
2006-12-25 12:15:48 · answer #3 · answered by comic book guy 2 · 7⤊ 0⤋
in many international locations this is impolite to communicate on your techniques. i grew to become into raised to communicate my techniques. I even have found out additionally that frequently times you will no longer make a determination on basically one individual opinion which you quite want different comments too. yet then this is not based on the country it in keeping with how individuals are raised. which won't say individuals sense the could desire to voice there opinion, this is all and sundry who needs a voice.
2016-11-23 17:01:42 · answer #4 · answered by phegley 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Only God can make a tree, but any fool can make a baby!
(Sorry -- That just slipped out!)
2006-12-25 23:26:35 · answer #5 · answered by correrafan 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Cause conservatives are into killing people( Iraq war, torture Bill), protecting child molesters( Foley), and telling lies( Bush, Limbaugh, Hannity)!
2006-12-25 13:02:56 · answer #6 · answered by The Idealist 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Why are conservatives into saving foetuses but letting their mothers starve to death? Why are they into saving bundles of cells, but executing rational moral human beings is perfectly ok?
2006-12-25 12:16:16 · answer #7 · answered by Mordent 7 · 7⤊ 1⤋
Why are you into false generalizations?
They are into saving the trees to preserve the environment for future generations.
They are not for killing babies they are for a woman having the right to decide whether or not she is able to terminate HER pregnancy.
2006-12-25 11:49:52 · answer #8 · answered by Perplexed 7 · 10⤊ 4⤋
why are cons into saving the unborn and killing people? is there a shortage of live targets?
2006-12-25 11:57:03 · answer #9 · answered by kissmy 4 · 5⤊ 2⤋
Cause they can make more babies when ever they want.
There is a limited supply of trees... or ones large enough to make me a really nice bed room suite.
2006-12-25 11:47:41 · answer #10 · answered by Dog Lover 7 · 3⤊ 4⤋