2006-12-25 11:22:23 · 26 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
YES!!
2006-12-25 11:25:12 · answer #1 · answered by ? 4 · 9⤊ 9⤋
What ever for? Waste the money and time that could be better spent on something useful? I'm no fan of W, but, come on! This late into the term, an Impeachment would be a fiasco and yet another unnecessary strain on the economy.
2006-12-25 19:57:31 · answer #2 · answered by sjsosullivan 5 · 4⤊ 5⤋
NO. Democrats know better than to waste the next 2 years and millions of taxpayer dollars on impeachment proceedings. The nation is very aware along with the rest of the world what Bush and his cohorts created. He will credited in life for his hand in the next 100 years of warring with the Middle East. And that is enough shame to make the Bush Clan move to Saudi Arabia and never be heard from again!
2006-12-25 19:33:40 · answer #3 · answered by Active Denial System™ 6 · 6⤊ 7⤋
Absolutely. Bush and the whole administration for planning and executing 9/11, for starting illegal wars with Afghanistan and Iraq, stealing trillions from the US, holding back technology that would bring everyone off oil, and just basically wrecking the world. Impeachment and jail I mean hard time with torture like so many others have endured.
2006-12-25 19:50:15 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 9⤊ 6⤋
And the charge would be what exactly?
The girl two up from me. Why the hell do you people keep insisting that Clintoon was impeached for a BJ? Is it so difficult to understand that he lied to congress while under oath? I hope you get a clue for Christmas!
2006-12-25 19:43:42 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 5⤋
Nope...impeachment was proven useless with Clinton. If we are gonna Impeach Bush for things that were not illegal...how about we start with all the Democrats and Republicans that actually have done illegal things...might be a good time to clean out the congress!
2006-12-25 19:36:04 · answer #6 · answered by Mikey ~ The Defender of Myrth 7 · 7⤊ 8⤋
Absolutely YES! If Clinton got impeached over a BJ, then Bush should definitely get impeached over starting an unnecessary war by LYING and then letting his creepy cohorts like Cheney, Ashcroft, etc., start dismantling the Constitution.
Bush is starting to make Nixon look good, and that's saying something!
2006-12-25 19:40:02 · answer #7 · answered by catrionn 6 · 9⤊ 9⤋
No, we should investigate the new leadership in the Senate and the House for ethics violations! Incoming Senate leader Reid and his real estate dealings with 273% profit in less than a year, and Speakeress Pelosi and her connections with the pedophiles at NAMBLA!
2006-12-25 19:36:10 · answer #8 · answered by taxidriver 4 · 5⤊ 7⤋
Impeaching George W. Bush would be unconstitutional, as he has done nothing to warrant a constitutional impeachment
2006-12-25 19:55:48 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 12⤋
On what grounds that will stand up in court?????Obviously he hasnt diddled an intern and lied to the federal court under oath.Oh I'm sorry..,that was ok for Clinton to do so.
2006-12-25 19:43:05 · answer #10 · answered by halfbright 5 · 4⤊ 7⤋
NO! Our President has not committed any impeachable offenses, and someday, grownups will realize that he is protecting their lives by fighting the terrorists in the Middle East where they originate from, instead of the streets of America!!
2006-12-25 19:30:54 · answer #11 · answered by Smoky! 4 · 5⤊ 11⤋