2006-12-25 09:56:43 · 10 answers · asked by braunstein12 1 in Beauty & Style ➔ Makeup
if it complements ur skin then HELL NO!!! dont go to over with anything tho. try out a couple different tans with a bronzer brush and see which amount you like best and then strive for that
2006-12-25 10:15:07 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
If you mean tanned vs pale skin, I think it really depends on the person. Either way is fine, as long as it compliments you. I've seen some very ugly tans mind you- mostly people who go to tanning beds and overdo it. They look not tan, but orange. I might be a bit biased though, I prize my pallor.
2006-12-25 22:28:29 · answer #2 · answered by kivrin9 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, but I love being pale :). Besides, the pursuit of getting a tan creates skin damage, which my friend IS ugly.
2006-12-25 23:04:48 · answer #3 · answered by Britterrsssss 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
depends. if it looks good on you, then no. If it looks too overdone and unnatural, then yes. Whatever fits your skin type and flatters best looks best. But tanning should be done in moderation
2006-12-25 20:28:23 · answer #4 · answered by Jenny 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No way! Tan is always better. You feel better, you look better, and people tend to be attracted to tan. I would fake it though.... lol
Anyway...Tan is better =)
2006-12-25 20:18:50 · answer #5 · answered by Amanda 1 · 0⤊ 3⤋
its better than bein pale unless the tan looks unnatural
2006-12-25 18:24:04 · answer #6 · answered by jersey_689 3 · 0⤊ 3⤋
of course not
its better than being pale... like white palee...
eekk ><
2006-12-26 20:02:27 · answer #7 · answered by Jessica K 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
i don't think so....its better than being pale
2006-12-25 20:45:00 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
uhh.....NO
2006-12-25 18:32:22 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
HELL NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2006-12-25 19:21:21 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋