Israel is the only Jewish state in the whole world. The Arabs have 22 states. The Arabs are not wiling to accept a Jewish state in their midst.
Israel thought that by leaving Gaza entirely in August 2005, that the Arabs would get their act together and develop their economy. Instead, the Arab have seen fit to launch thousands of missiles at Israel's civilian population, intending to kill as many citizens as possible.
Israel, on the other hand, is trying to live in peace. When they do attack, it is with the clear objective of silencing the Arab terrorists. By international law, Israel is totally justified in its quest to protect its citizens. The Arabs are in total violation of international law by unprovoked attacking of innocent civilians in Israel.
The Palestinian Arabs could have had a state already, if they only behaved like civilized human beings. But they have proven time and again that they are not ready to behave, and so the Arabs will have to exist with "only" 22 states.
As long as the Arabs refuse to accept a Jewish state in the Middle East, the conflict will remain unresolved. Israel must completely and totally defeat the Arabs, so that a peace treaty can be signed and enforced.
2006-12-28 22:48:45
·
answer #1
·
answered by Ivri_Anokhi 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nope. You have completely misunderstood the question you have quoted. Essentially what that guy is saying is his version of the answer you gave him. Don't mess with us or you'll come to harm - something that applies to Arab countries just as much as it applies to the US. Or do you believe only the US has the right to further interests? Do you believe all Muslims are terrorists, and all those who make friends with any Muslim support terrorists? If so you are incredibly ignorant. There ARE extremists who want the West to be subjugated to their rule. There are also many citizens of your own country who regularly say "nuke the arabs" - how do these ideologies differ? Both seek the utter destruction of the other for no greater a crime than existing.
The question you quote also notes that Israel and the US have interfered in the Middle East so much that the people there view them as the source of ALL their problems. This of course is not so - but the US has consistently interfered in affairs which DO NOT CONCERN THEM. For instance the US supported Iraq in the Iran/Iraq war - gave weapons and technology to Sadam Hussein.
The US did nothing when Israel declared war on Lebanon - indeed Israel did nothing but bomb seven hells out of Lebanon, they didn't even get the soldier that was kidnapped and started the whole war back. Is it so hard to understand that many in the Middle East view this as Israel just wantonly destroying a country - and using the kidnap as an excuse to do this? Right or wrong, that is what people there think. Perhaps instead of 'dealing with them' you should leave them alone and let them deal with themselves, instead of continually stirring up trouble.
2006-12-25 10:10:23
·
answer #2
·
answered by Mordent 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Ok, in the author did write "... each of these breakdowns of social order appears to have been engineered either by the United States or by Israel..." The keyword is "engineered", which has a WHOLELOTTA IMPLICATIONS and probably couldn't be proven even 100 years from now when the pertinent documents will be de-classified. Some documents probably will never be de-classified (for historians to evaluate and ponder), My point is that the author did not support his thesis with evidence - but then he couldn't anyway on this forum - even if he had it (and he obviously doesn't). This is not a PhD dissertation (and nor could it credibly be) and you're not on the faculty either...it's just someone speculating aloud on Yahoo and like it or not America is pretty staunchly into that whole "Free Speech" and "Freedom of the Press" thing...
2006-12-25 18:07:51
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Serb for ever, you could no longer advise that we deserved 9-11. we are all basically known human beings, and the international is administered via the elite wealthy minority. something of basically are basically pawns of their interest. maximum folk in u.s.- a minimum of in my neck of the woods, can no longer look previous their human beings, cosmo, and US magazine or turn off the E community, to be sure what is going on. journalists feed us thoughts virtually making the albanians victims, even whilst the dedicate crimes. First we could practice the majority- if you desire to give up electing crap representatives. I for one, as a 2nd technology Serb, do no longer help it. and that i don't be attentive to ways we could ever make it as much as you. yet quickly I think of we can see precisely what mistake we made. and it is often too previous due. :-(
2016-10-28 08:39:37
·
answer #4
·
answered by ridinger 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I do not see any support for terrorists in what he said.In fact I thought he had some very valid points
2006-12-25 09:39:39
·
answer #5
·
answered by rosbif 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
yes it is nice,a lot of terrorist are muslims. they shoudent be though cause they are killing muslims and are a disgrase to all muslims and making us look bad but
, yes it is nice ,nice talking to you
2006-12-25 09:42:01
·
answer #6
·
answered by Lina 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
muslims arent terrorists u are *****
2006-12-25 19:10:57
·
answer #7
·
answered by sheuxnyk 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
reread the post you are complaining about. he is not taking sides.
2006-12-25 11:11:02
·
answer #8
·
answered by kissmy 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
one mans terrorist is anther mans freedom fighter
2006-12-25 09:39:31
·
answer #9
·
answered by alenn g 4
·
2⤊
2⤋
the truth is often hard to bear
2006-12-25 09:39:36
·
answer #10
·
answered by Ringo G. 4
·
1⤊
2⤋