I sure do, especially when they get all hot under the collar when you refuse to accept their dogma at face value. They claim to be "tolerant" and "accepting", yet when you have an opposing viewpoint you're "stupid" or "refuse to accept the facts (read:dogma)" or the handiest one, you're a "Bushbot" (I think anyway).
For the record I dislike Bush, but for the right reasons.
2006-12-25 03:54:42 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Yes everything that you said is true....
One example that I have personally is....
As a Christian I have to (more and more) be mindful of who I say what to in terms of my religion as I might offend someone....
BUT...it's ok for them to push that homosexuality is "just another lifestyle" in the public school systems around here.
They do not have to be tolerant of my religious beliefs but I have to be tolerant of them teaching my son that homosexuality is OK.
homosexuality=good
God=bad
2006-12-25 03:59:26 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I choose i ought to! My international view is in accordance to technological knowledge. The evaluations I carry, at the same time as i'm being severe and under no circumstances a stupid Willy, are in accordance to observable organic regulations. once you're arguing a scientifically probably position, that's difficult to be humble! there is 0 robust medical data for most stupid (there i bypass back) beliefs held with the help of a good many human beings. Alien visitation, the heeling power of magnets, ghosts, telepresence, astrology, theism, vampires and so on... i'm not so very such as this on basically social and philosophical topics. those issues are concerns of opinion and that i comprehend that. If, besides the indisputable fact that, you get me occurring concerns that lack genuine data I were regularly occurring to coach into an finished dick and belittle those who have nonsensical options. (((sassy)))
2016-12-01 04:05:15 · answer #2 · answered by mrotek 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes I do. And ditto for self-righteous right wingers. You seem to be an intelligent individual, you should really apply that to yer political queries, I think you could really provoke thought if you wanted to. It's great that you're a Libertarian, but try posting something beside laughable bashing of the opposition. Honestly that makes you look just as idiotic as the majority of the people on this site pretending they know stuff about politics. Stand out in the crowd, knuckle-head, and Merry Christmas! Peace and GOD bless!
2006-12-25 05:27:40 · answer #3 · answered by Rick R 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Well you dislike Bush for the right reasons I guess that's a step above for liking him for the wrong reasons...if poking fun at self righteous lefties amuses you that's your gig but Your question seems a little self righteous so I hope you can poke fun at your self !!
2006-12-25 04:07:28 · answer #4 · answered by dadacoolone 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I enjoy poking fun at self-righteous conservatives who completely outdo the liberals in the arena of overly-pretentious behavior.
2006-12-25 04:30:32 · answer #5 · answered by brian2412 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No. But I DO enjoy heckling pompous, arrogant "righties" who only want to see the world THEIR way;
who support illegal and unconstitutional wars on other sovereign nations;
who believe the U.S. has the right to squander 55% of the world's resources even though it represents only 5% of the global population;
who subscribe to the Reagan theory of "All for one - ME";
who don't approve of government entitlements such as welfare for the poor, but support corporate welfare and government bail-outs of America's largest corporations;
who twist and distort the truth to their advantage;
who arrogantly think it was okay to spend billions of taxpayer dollars to impeach Bill Clinton for lying to Congress about some shabby real estate deals and an extra-marital indiscretion with another consenting adult, yet who refuse to impeach George W. Bush for lying to Congress about weapons of mass destruction that embroiled us in a war that's killed almost 700,000 people;who supports economic policies that will surely draw the U.S. into a severe economic depression shortly after Bush leaves offices;
who hate homosexuals, liberals, street-corner drug addicts, and poor people, but apparently embrace pedophiles, conservatives of all stripes, prescription-drug abusers like Rush Limbaugh, wife beaters, alcoholics, wealthy people who accumulated their wealth through shady or suspicious means, white collar criminals, and war-mongering profiteers;
who condone the torture and abuse of 'detainees' in direct violation of the Geneva Convention;
who...oh, what the hell...the list could go on forever! -RKO-
2006-12-25 04:12:25 · answer #6 · answered by -RKO- 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I think if either side does it than it is immature. It solves none of the issues and only causes a larger divide.
2006-12-25 03:58:51 · answer #7 · answered by Stand 4 somthing Please! 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I enjoy poking fun at neo-cons such as your-self. As far as your question. I think most "lefties" would tell you that they don't tolerate hate, racism, violence etc.. It is not that we think your "stupid" we just think your ignorant. Hate the sin, not the sinner.
2006-12-25 04:01:09 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
Omg.. who are you "poking fun" At? thats just racist! to other religions and other peeps beliefs or anyother reason! And who is "they"?
2006-12-25 03:58:00 · answer #9 · answered by ♦Its•Possible•But•Not•Logical♦ 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I prefer poking at Self-leftist righties.....
2006-12-25 03:58:13 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋