2006-12-25 03:03:44 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Computers & Internet ➔ Security
yes i do, no probs here
2006-12-25 03:11:46 · answer #1 · answered by a m 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why would you need both? If you have Norton 2006, your subscription will be running out, then you'll either have to pay again, or get something else. Windows Defender is good, not the best, but better than Norton, which is a big memory and resource hog. I'd keep Windows Defender and get rid of Norton.
2006-12-25 03:07:42 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Yes you wont know defender is running unless you get a problem.
Dump norton slows you down. Use a free antivirus.
2006-12-28 19:06:19 · answer #3 · answered by 1willie1 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes
2006-12-25 03:06:52 · answer #4 · answered by taxed till i die,and then some. 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You can definitely use Defender as an on-demand scanner without any conflict. However, using Defender's resident real-time protection with a few security suites has been known to conflict.
One way to find out. Give it a try!
2006-12-25 03:08:09 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes.
2006-12-25 03:07:08 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes, but NIS works way better in my opinion.
2006-12-25 11:01:14 · answer #7 · answered by Scott Bull 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes I already do, and it does not conflict.
2006-12-25 03:14:29 · answer #8 · answered by CT 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋