Assuming no one would be hurt. I'm not asking this because I am considering breaking the law, I was just wondering what people would say.
2006-12-24 23:07:25 · 15 answers · asked by Jack S 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
I see that many of those that have answered have not ben really hungry. To say you would not break the law with or without hurting someone is not thinking very well.
I have been where people have families that are starving to death and if you think they would not break the law to provide for them even if it meant their life you are very wring. They will and they do. Many fail and still loose their lives but they do try.
Those of you on this site most likely would not but if your family ever is starving then I bet the answer would be different.
2006-12-25 00:14:07 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
If you break the law, someone always gets hurt. It may not be physical but none the less, someone gets hurt.
In saying that, If breaking the law meant members of my family would never have a *need* denied I can't say I would not do it. The deal breaker for me would be needing something instead of wanting something. None of us knows what we would do in a situation like this. If I had a child who needed a new kidney or a liver to survive, you can bet I will do what is necessary to accomplish it.
If my child simply wants something, no. You fulfill one want and there are two more waiting in line. Enough is never enough. You can't buy or acquire contentment. .
2006-12-25 08:09:42 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Lemme just give you a glimpse into my world. Im a very intelligent educated young man who dispite the educational advantages I have have still not found a steady source of income. Now, that being said, lets leave my family out of this. If I knew that I would never want for anything again, hell yeah I would break the law to get whatever I needed and I dont care who has to get hurt or who sees me, their momma, their grand momma, little babies, bill collectors, whatever. I'll be in their *** like Spencer for ****** hire.
2006-12-25 07:10:52 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Depends on the consequences; If its like bank robbing or something that could get you a ton of jail time, then no your family would rather have you here and not have everything theyve ever wanted then not have you, or the money your bringing in already.
But if its like something little; then hell go for it. Whats the worst that can happen if it some little sh!t?
2006-12-25 07:18:51 · answer #4 · answered by I Hate Liberals 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, why would you break the law in the first place? Its a loose, loose thing,
Would you break the law (and gain nothing from it), and let your family hate you?
Um no.
2006-12-25 07:10:10 · answer #5 · answered by hawthorne_heights_421 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
my family is the most important thing in the world to me. i know what it is like to want/need things that are critical to your well being. i never want any of my loved ones to feel like that. so yes i would. as long as no one gets hurt.
2006-12-25 07:19:22 · answer #6 · answered by flower 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. Because the one thing they could not do without, even if they had money, is me. Families are not just about money. They are about love.
2006-12-25 07:09:09 · answer #7 · answered by Isis 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
it all depends on the law that is getting broken. I would go 45mph in a 35mph for $2,000,000.
2006-12-25 07:10:39 · answer #8 · answered by neoconsmile 1 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I'm game lol. As long as no blood is shed. Be careful and take care of your business bro.
2006-12-25 10:56:38 · answer #9 · answered by sftbllr4lf 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
yes if i knew i wouldn't get caught. i would do much worse for my family, so why don't give them security they deserve.
2006-12-25 07:13:39 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋