Should the Capital Punishment be banned ?

Answer 1

I'll probably get some thumbs down for this but I think NO. I really feel that some criminals can not be rehabilitated. Some of them will even admit that if let back out into society they will continue their sexual molesting and murder. I'm sorry, but someone who molests and kills a child does not deserve to live.

Answer 2

It seems to me that capital punishment serves to alleviate the need in some for retribution for a crime committed against a loved one. In that vein I can certainly see understand the desire to have a death sentence carried out. What troubles me, however, are reports postmortem regarding errors - innocent people dying. Now we have 2 wrongs; the first victim, and now the innocent person, wrongly accused, wrongly convicted, wrongly executed. Nothing has been solved, only more pain inflicted on another person's survivors. And the true perpetrator of the crime still free. DNA evidence appears at least to be alleviating some of these errors, but the element of human error still exists. How do you completely eliminate that? I have never lost a loved one to a violent crime, so I don't know if my opinion would change if this were to occur. Life in prison without parole certainly doesn't sound like a very fulfilling life either.

Answer 3

How mean is man! He worries about his own death only. And he simply kills lakhs of animals daily for eating - who are also god's creature. In the wake of bird-flu, he had simply killed lakhs of harmless birds to the last because he might be diseased by eating them. And you are debating for a person who has harmed a fellow human-being either through rape or murder - the crimes for which capital punishment is awarded. Even otherwise, that criminal would die in normal course. Then why not hasten that inevitable if he is a curse to the society.

Answer 4

I think they should come up with an alternative to capital Punishment. Like putting them all on a deserted island to fend for themselves, with no hopes of ever returning. Prisons are to full, expensive and a lot get out and do it all again, so they can go back in because they have become institutionalized and don't know how to live on the outside anymore.

Answer 5

I'm not sure there is enough information on either side to say whether it is or isn't a successful deterrent. All studies done by both sides use testing methods that drive towards an expected and really predetermined answer. They're completely biased.

Personally, I think it should exist for the highest crime, which is First Degree Murder (murder with intent and awareness), anything else doesn't deserve it. In today's world of forensic science, it's rare that anyone innocent gets convicted or anyone guilty gets away, so I don't know why we should let these no conscience killers roam around prisons for life harming other inmates who still have a chance to redeem themselves.

Answer 6

As far as here on earth goes, we all get capital punishment in the end.

Answer 7

capital punishment is a reflection of society. An eye for an eye only leaves everyone blind.

Answer 8

The Innocence Project has helped release _188_ people from "death row" who were innocent, and those are only the cases that have been overturned; dozens, if not hundreds, of other innocent people have been executed without the chance to reopen their false convictions.

http://www.innocenceproject.org/

ONE innocent person executed is too many. Until an absolute guarantee that no innocent person can possibly be executed (eg. viewing by time travel), the "death penalty" (also called "murder by the state") is revenge, bloodlust and vigilantism. It is not justice. "Life with no parole" works, and innocent people can be released.

You can't appeal a "death sentence".


.

Answer 9

Yes. It's barbaric state sponsored murder that does NOT work as a deterrent. (Countries without capital punishment have lower incidences of "capital crimes" like homicde)

It's not even punishnment - it's just naked revenge.

Answer 10

Vote for politicians who're damaging to it. Its no longer a substantial situation to maximum electorate and elected officers, however. do no longer anticipate something to alter with reference to the dying penalty any time quickly.