One study proves nothing. One of my sons isn't circumcised and the doctor has told me it doesn't matter either way health wise as long as its properly cleaned.. and AIDS um abstinence or condom always safest bets no matter what.
2006-12-24 22:17:23
·
answer #1
·
answered by luckyducky0521g 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
Aids is so out there note that circumcised or uncircumcised the whole world is affected and infected. Do it if you feel it is the right thing to do and you are willing to go through the pain. They usually circumcise babies just to be clean and healthy. The forskin is not properly cleaned and I have seen sores trapped in the skin and it is not a pretty sight or heal well when air can not get to it. As a woman I would not want to be with a uncircumcised man. I just would not find it attractive at the point so to speak. Just to be clean and healthy on my part... Not so much the religious thing but it is a plus to be blessed by "God that the man is a part of His covenant with Abraham and Isaac"
Jesus accepts circumsized and uncircumsized so long as you believe and sin no more. It is a preference now day and time...
2006-12-24 23:16:02
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
I am only sure of a few things. The more we learn the less we know. Maybe we are wiser than the one who designed us be it creator or genetics. But I find it pretty amusing that we think removing body parts is an intelligent procedure. If a similar study revealed that circumcising females offered the same protections this study claims do you think we would see women rushing in for the procedure? It is done in some tribal cultures in Africa, every indication there is that is is a terrible procedure for the females I have heard it called a human rights violation and I actually agree. As a hold over religious tradition meant as an offering to Gods' or God I suppose it has relevance(circumcission). But these studies have been ongoing now for decades. How about I preform a surgical procedure on any of your children without anesthesia? Cmon....they won't remeber it. While I won't label circumcison as barbaric it doesn't take much of a "stretch" to arrive there. Be well.
2006-12-25 03:05:06
·
answer #3
·
answered by Rod s 2
·
1⤊
2⤋
The study you mention proves nothing!
AIDS comes independently from the foreskin!
We all born with foreskin because it's an important part of the penis. And if you want, I can send you a long list about the good reasons to keep it. About sex, circumcised people even are having less satisfaction and pleasure during the acts..... you're right about that!
2006-12-24 22:29:36
·
answer #4
·
answered by whole_feelings 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
The study is NOT stupid.
Its not almost proved. It has been FIRMLY proved.
Circumcision reduces the risk of contracting AIDS-HIV and other STD's up to 70%
Why? The foreskin is to blame. The inner part of the foreskin is specially prone to let the viruses into the body due to its nature (does not have a protein called 'keratin' wich blocks the AIDS virus)
Like it or not, beleive it or not, circumcision protects agains AIDS.
2006-12-26 07:46:17
·
answer #5
·
answered by Scuba 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
If your reason for worrying about this is the risk of getting AIDS, perhaps you should opt for using more conventional and proven protection methods instead. You know!
And if your woman likes you enough to get into the convertible she wouldn't be that bothered about minor anatomical details. Trust me, there is more to the ride for us girls that the specification details of the vehicle! A smooth driver can make even a fiesta zoom zooooom ;o)
2006-12-24 22:20:43
·
answer #6
·
answered by confused_kitty 2
·
3⤊
0⤋
seem, you will get distinctive responses right here with the aid of fact there are human beings helping the two reasons. there is not any particular style of guy it quite is "cleanser", in fact all and sundry would desire to bathe and prepare secure intercourse. a million) No distinction 2) No conclusive examine, in spite of the fact that some human beings claimed circumcised develop into greater effective, however the examine weren't conclusive surprisingly as they have been accomplished in Africa the place there is greater often than not detrimental hygiene besides 3) seem it up on wikipedia 4) maximum examine prepare greater excitement for the girls (and probable the adult males) with uncircumcised 5) Duh 6) Uh yeah duh lots of the adult males contained in the international are uncircumcised, that is how they're born, that is organic, so lots of the girls contained in the international are having intercourse with uncircumcised adult males, in the event that they wash and prepare secure intercourse then that is all sturdy :-) some human beings will declare that the foreskin harbours micro organism, yet there does not seem any sparkling information that being circumcised is greater hygienic, and that is not any longer counseled as a technique by Paediatric institutions or comparable. some persons are used to circumcision and so as that they like it, in spite of the indisputable fact that it develop into rather designed initially for non secular reasons.
2016-12-18 18:49:31
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, you don't. You don't have to if you don't want to. As long as you practice safe sex and proper hygiene, why should it matter to you anyway? For something really interesting, look at the link. There is something you can do to essentially negate the difference between having and not having a foreskin in regards to contracting HIV.
2006-12-28 03:51:31
·
answer #8
·
answered by trebla_5 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is not necessary but there r some advantages of circumcision. Ur sensitivity of the penis reduces and hence the pleasure but it increases ur capacity to go on pumping.
2006-12-24 23:00:10
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
I know someone who got circumsized as an adult....Let's just put it this way: he looked so hurt up, I felt his pain...
2006-12-24 22:38:23
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋