English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I've noticed recently that countries who have been developing nuclear weapons end up with some sort of beneficiary deal if they stop 'producing' nuclear capabilties. For example, Iran, North Korea and Egypt. Are countries developing Nukes to get something out of the West for free?

2006-12-24 21:25:58 · 6 answers · asked by Limeyb 2 in News & Events Current Events

6 answers

no, but Israel does

2006-12-24 22:41:50 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Well honestly nukeular power is a huge cost saver so they should get rewards for not having it at there own expense. The fact that its produces weapons grade nuke materials is the reason why we are willing to pay them to not develop these technologys... But the thing is these countrys run on mostly oil based acconomy and there oil is running out so they are stuck in a do or die situation when they look at there future. So they either get nuke power or go back to stone ages and be over taken by the ones with nuke power. IF you look from there perspective or try to youll see why its so important to them. If you close your mind off and dont try to see in there eyes you become blinded yourself. A Fool is man who can see but choices not too. We are all fools in some way shape or form.

And actualy the less countrys that have nukes the more likely one country will have total control and thats bad imo.

2006-12-25 01:42:58 · answer #2 · answered by magpiesmn 6 · 0 1

Yes, it's a shame that these countries can't come up with a peaceful way of bolstering their economy. I'm sure if they used their money and energy in ways that would help their people their country would prosper.
The more countries that have nuclear weapons, the more likely that the earth will become uninhabitable.

2006-12-24 21:44:57 · answer #3 · answered by sparks 7 · 1 0

arent they always trying to get something from the west for free.

2006-12-25 12:35:55 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

an interesting theory

2006-12-24 21:27:35 · answer #5 · answered by Dashes 6 · 1 1

IT WASN'T EGYPT.
IT WAS LIBYA.

2006-12-24 21:31:22 · answer #6 · answered by john john 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers