1. The celebrity system of remuneration, where compensation is disproportionate to value added and to talent.
2. The Bush tax system which has virtually ceased to tax the super-rich and put the principal burden of taxation on the middle class (and, in the UK, longstanding tax anomalies that make the UK a tax haven for the very rich).
3. A revaluation of land, due largely to: women entering the work force at professional levels and marrying male professionals; computerization which made professionals more efficient; globalization which concentrated wealth in finance and the professions. (The end effect was a transfer of wealth from those now buying homes to their grandparents; and via inheritance from the latter to their parents.)
4. As college education has risen in price -- even at public universities -- it has ceased to be available to the poor and lower middle class and the traditional means of entry into the upper middle class and the wealthy has disappeared.
2006-12-24 21:17:30
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
not truly. that is what i imagine the teachings are presently and the position they're going to stay. the firstclass is for the employees which have little or no means if any or don't have any pastime, the subsequent type will be workers interior the trades, the subsequent one will be college knowledgeable center type workers that artwork alot yet make somewhat bit more beneficial than the trades in the experience that they are fortunate (accountants, experts in public service, economic analysts, some attorneys, and so on. they in many circumstances own a Bachelors or Masters), then there'll be the decrease top type usually made from small organization vendors, medical doctors, some attorneys, and finally as continually anybody's well known, the large rich. The large rich in many circumstances contain CEOs and CFOs of Fortune 500 businesses, hedge fund managers in bust cycles, huge-spread human beings interior the leisure market, human beings in specialist activities and so on. Congress LOL.
2016-12-01 04:00:06
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The simplest way to put it is when you have money it is easier to get money. Think of it like this: when you have a lot of money in the bank, the bank actually gives you more money in interest because you have so much. Diversely, if you have less than the minimum balance in your bank account you get money taken away from you (5 or 10 dollars a month etc) as a fee not to mention the service charges for overdraft. Success begets more success by allowing the person to use their current success to prevent challenge by those who dont currently have their level of success, and out of the contest to the victor goes the spoils.
2006-12-24 23:07:34
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The poorer spend more money than they can afford to. The richer get the money the poorer spend.
2006-12-24 23:37:29
·
answer #4
·
answered by Jomtien C 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The rich had controlled the economy and had exploited the systems so that wealth will go to their pockets rather than being channelled to the poor majority. They had a great influence on the politicians and economic leaders.
2006-12-24 21:19:12
·
answer #5
·
answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Real education. Belief in success. Investments. The ability to simplify ones life. Karma. Law of Attraction: What you feel expands your reality and what you believe you deserve will be attracted to you.
Find energy that is abundant, and seek to abolish motivations stemming from Fear.
Good luck my friend, and don't give up.
2006-12-24 21:18:50
·
answer #6
·
answered by STY 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Education is the key. Just look at Oprah Winfrey's biography.
2006-12-25 05:05:03
·
answer #7
·
answered by childofGod 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
well i think it is because poor people spend money on making there lives a little better , rich people spend money on starting a new buisness
2006-12-24 21:18:37
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
because poor people have more children, and children make people happy. rich people aren't happy. they're too busy working and serving their master Money.
2006-12-24 21:15:27
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
life is unfair maybe
2006-12-25 08:11:15
·
answer #10
·
answered by ewwwtendancefrankcom 1
·
1⤊
0⤋