Here is a story from reuters...
http://today.reuters.co.uk/news/articlenews.aspx?storyid=2006-12-24T134319Z_01_L24179459_RTRUKOC_0_UK-RELIGION-BRITAIN-VEIL.xml&type=domesticNews&WTmodLoc=UK-C3-More-2
And here is the BBC site, which has no mention of this story...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/default.stm
Does anyone know why the BBC tries to avoid reporting race related crimes against white people, and yet if race related crimes against ethnic minorities get reported ALL over the news?
2006-12-24 19:32:33 · 10 answers · asked by shoby_shoby2003 5 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Everything is politics. In the USA, if a hispanic kid was missing it might make the second page. BUT get a rich little white kid and it makes front page news. Depends on the paper's editor and what they support.
2006-12-24 19:36:27 · answer #1 · answered by Big C 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
constructive. some Blacks believe that we are ultimately "Getting ours", yet i believe that many non-Blacks will use Obama's election as an excuse to rage against Blacks too (a minimum of verbally, politically, and socially somewhat than bodily). this is basically business corporation as customary however. Oh, and what human beings could desire to realize is that Obama is in straightforward terms a zionist puppet like something of him, and given the way that the international works, I see Obama being in place of work as extra risky to Blacks than useful. Peep this: Obama is the president of the U. S., yet Blacks are nonetheless the only race that can't get laid in japan...
2016-11-23 16:17:07 · answer #2 · answered by gfroerer 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
To report a racially motivated attack against white people would be racial reporting against the attackers.....they are the minority suffering from alienation and segregation.....poor little dears.
They emigrate to a better country and life bleed the system and scream blue murder if they dont get their way.....by the way im an immigrant.....working paying taxes and getting on with life.
2006-12-24 19:54:27 · answer #3 · answered by hughr k 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Because BBC now stands for Billious Bombastic Commies What else?
2006-12-24 20:56:50 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Just typical liberal reporting. The BBC had no outrage when white Rhodesian farmers were terrorized or murdered either.
2006-12-25 02:54:45 · answer #5 · answered by Mr.Wise 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The BBC was hardly ever objective. And this phenomenon, of media not reporting such crimes, encourages the criminals.
2006-12-24 21:25:30 · answer #6 · answered by Avner Eliyahu R 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
For some reason the UK is turning into the US.
2006-12-24 19:35:20 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
The US and GB are terrible about political correctness. Nobody has any balls and it ought to be reported as it is.
2006-12-24 19:35:10 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
its not news.
2006-12-25 12:40:25 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
yep it depends on the media
2006-12-24 19:41:25 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋