2006-12-24 19:16:36 · 8 answers · asked by wwwwwwwfe 1 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Physics
He'd remind each object to "Stay the Course".
2006-12-24 19:26:17 · answer #1 · answered by apulidous 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Nothing. It takes a smarter man than Bush to figure out that there can't be two unstoppable objects in the same universe--for precisely that reason.
2006-12-25 19:46:22 · answer #2 · answered by Amy F 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
this is hassle-free, Mr Smarty Pants. there's no answer considering which you have skipped over soooooo lots records. a million) Relative length 2) Relative speeds 3) Relative hundreds and densities 4) Relative hardness and unity (shape) of each and every merchandise 5) Shapes, is one sharp and one flat surfaced you like all and sundry to think of you're soooooo clever considering which you have asked a question you're saying they could't answer properly. nicely Mr Genius, even Albert Einstein could no longer answer this question with the records provided. So, please, pass away, provide up asking, and attempt convince another group of human beings how clever you're! ok my question are beside the point, so i ought to respond to them besides i admire. a million) a million is the scale of the sunlight, and a million the scale of a grain of sand. 2) The "sunlight" is shifting on the value of sunshine, the sand at 1mm consistent with millenium. 3) The "sunlight" has the mass and relative density of a black hollow, the sand is gaseous and has un registerable density, this is that easy it won't be ready to be measured. 4) The "sunlight" has a hardness score of one hundred on the Moh's scale (diamonds are toughest at ~10), the sand has a hardness score of 0.0000001 5) Now completely beside the point given a million to 4 above. results of the collision of those 2 products? The "sunlight" keeps on on the value of sunshine, the "sand", given the density of the "sunlight" could theoretically end to exist, yet certainly could now basically be an infinitesimal small area of the "sunlight". or you do you reside in comedian e book land? in the event that they the two persisted on, unaffected, it skill they have gone by one yet another. in the event that they bypass by one yet another they have certainly no longer collided! So what you're saying is which you ought to have asked this interior the philosophy area somewhat of the technology area. there's no answer different than for the single you like, or hypothesise is the terrific suited one. it may be like me asking you to grant me an answer to this question: resolve for y, giving a finite quantity as your answer, while y = a million/x and x = 0. you're a important d!ckhead, who has delusions of better intelligence. all people can ask an impossible question without parameters, and then tell all and sundry they are incorrect, because of the fact the question has no answer. save on with philosophy and supply the technology a pass over, junior, 'reason you needless to say know extra approximately comedian books than you do technology!
2016-11-23 16:16:44 · answer #3 · answered by gfroerer 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That statement seems to be an oxymoron. The source of that statement is just a moron.
2006-12-24 19:42:38 · answer #4 · answered by Tim C 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Just another "Bushism" to add to the book! (Like: most of our imports come from other countries etc...)
The man does not know his right from his left, and you expect him to know physics??
You are dreaming! Like all those who elected him.
2006-12-24 20:10:48 · answer #5 · answered by just "JR" 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
that was not their fault, and i will seek out and destroy the evil that caused that to happen... with his weapons of mass destruction... and take his oil illegally... or atleast try to...
2006-12-24 19:25:17 · answer #6 · answered by J Balla 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Lol! Did he REALLY say that? Seems to me so thoughtful a question....
2006-12-24 19:31:20 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It would be a catastrophic catastrophy.
2006-12-24 19:18:40 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋