I like this question. Nobody knows the answer but me.
2006-12-24 19:15:06 · 9 answers · asked by wwwwwwwfe 1 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Physics
Neither would stop, they would phase right through each other.
Seems kind of silly doesn't it.
Here's the thing. Nothing is unstopable! Just as nothing is unmovable, or notihng is irresistable.
While in a thought question, it is allowed to postulate something that does not exist in reality, you can not postulate two unreal things things that are mutally exclusive. That is a big no-no.
So, if you postulate one unstopable object, you can not have another, or a force that could stop it. They can not exist together.
2006-12-24 19:23:32 · answer #1 · answered by Walking Man 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nothing too big, but your insurance premiums would increase anyway.
But don't worry about it. The California State legislature is going to put forward legislation to stop unstoppable objects, along with irresistible forces, unless they pay a cosmic luxury tax.
2006-12-24 19:31:11 · answer #2 · answered by Boomer Wisdom 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Rosie O'donnell will get fired. Donald Trump messed up his toupe.
2006-12-24 19:18:53 · answer #3 · answered by hartless63 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They would pass through each other and continue on the same vector as before.
2006-12-24 19:17:48 · answer #4 · answered by Johnny Q. 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It'll bounce back like she says up there.
2006-12-24 19:55:10 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nothing.
2006-12-24 19:17:00 · answer #6 · answered by Zhukov 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
what that's mean unstoppable?
2006-12-25 01:07:48 · answer #7 · answered by Juan D 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
they either stop or rebound with each others velocities.
2006-12-24 19:32:45 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
They would crash into eachother and say "Hi!"
2006-12-24 19:17:25 · answer #9 · answered by ElementCS13 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋