2006-12-24 17:27:34 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
yes he is
2006-12-24 17:29:10 · answer #1 · answered by FOX NEWS WATCHER 1 · 8⤊ 3⤋
that's unusual how the passage of time influence public opinion on some thing like this. Ten or 15 years from now someone will write a e book on the Bush years. by some ability the e book should not be truly the way we save in options it as we talk, and the slant of the e book would do a lot to the want or disfavor of the Bush image. I used to imagine Clinton replaced into the worst president, until eventually Bush got here alongside, and then i began to choose Clinton replaced into decrease back back. My maximum worrisome nightmare is that with each and each successive president, they visit pot, the known public turns into extra overwhelmed down and tolerant and gawd that's scary to imagine of the destiny. We the human beings do not seem to truly 'call for' severe peformance of our leaders anymore. We basically attempt to not seem too close and desire for the superb. Did I swerve out of your unique question? as we talk i imagine Bush is both the worst or a reliable challenger for the area, besides the indisputable fact that it received't wonder me in any respect if a destiny president (political demonination having not some thing to do with it) upsets and replaces Bush as worst.
2016-12-01 03:58:04 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Do you get the feeling that the people that say Bush is the greatest President actually only know about 3 presidents!?
Anyway, a very large, bi-partisan group of American Historians and American Presidential Historians recently turned out a study naming Bush the worst President ever.
2006-12-24 19:48:21 · answer #3 · answered by bettysdad 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, Jimmy Carter is always be known as the worst. The economy hit bottom, unemployment was at it's highest and the military was cut back to nothing.
2006-12-25 09:13:47 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. He is defintiely in the bottom half, but my suggestion would be Hoover. He lead America into the worst depression ever and showed no leadership or ideas to get us out. He also outlawed the consumption of alcohol which lead to the rise of organized crime.
2006-12-24 17:35:37 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
No there have been worse, not too many but a few, ANdrew Jackson, casued the trail of tears leading to the death of many American Indians, Aberham linclon, divided a country , ordered the largest mass execution in American History when he ordered 39 Santee Sioux hung Richard Nixon, he thought anyone opposed to him politically was a terorist and had them jialed, framed, what ever it took. But I'd place Bush next
2006-12-24 17:35:38 · answer #6 · answered by paulisfree2004 6 · 0⤊ 4⤋
Well...that's subjective and depends completely on which individual you ask don't you think? Seems as if you are trying to hear a little preaching to the choir. Could be wrong though.
And so far, U.S. Grant has that distinction. The rest are up to individual opinions. So, in short....no.
2006-12-24 17:33:34 · answer #7 · answered by Rich B 5 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Yes. History will describe him as the most hated American president, not in the history of America; but the world!!!
2006-12-24 17:30:27 · answer #8 · answered by Zabanya 6 · 8⤊ 2⤋
No worst existed in the past.
Any doubt?
Only one more there but he is in Pakistan.
2006-12-24 21:19:48 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
yes, he is. and the only thing we have to look forward to is he will be out of there soon. hopefully before he does to much more damage.
2006-12-24 17:45:26 · answer #10 · answered by Kismitt 6 · 4⤊ 1⤋
mmmyes international terrorist and he did 9/11 and stole the damn 2000 elction in the first place HE IS NOT THE REAL PRESIDENT ANYWAY!
2006-12-24 17:29:55 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 3⤋