English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

its a lot for 1 w anker

2006-12-24 13:06:45 · 28 answers · asked by the devil666 2 in Politics & Government Government

28 answers

George Bush couldn't win an argument with a 2 year old! He has (with the help of satan in the form of donald rumsfeld) created a civil war in Iraq which could spill over into many other islamic countries, destabilising the whole region even further. This idiot who thinks abortion is a crime against god because everyone has 'the right to life' yet still managed to execute more people than any other texas govenor before him (and thats saying something) should never have been elected to the PTA - let alone as leader of the free world. Please americans, when the next elections come around don't be apathetic use your vote and keep would-be war criminals out of the white house!

2006-12-24 13:41:27 · answer #1 · answered by koikoiboi 3 · 3 0

The Iraq war is won. This is something that I always have considered an idiotic point against Bush that people make that has no logical merit, only rhetorical vanity. The goal of the USA military was to: 1) Remove Saddam and his inner cabal from power - achieved. 2) Remove all WMDs -achieved. Massive stockpiles were not found, but WMDs were discovered, as well as the means to produce them. That was the goal of the war, and Bush achieved those goals. We won. The real question is will George Bush win the peace. Will the new Iraqi government take root with our assistance? That remains to be seen.

2016-05-23 04:50:32 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

What war? This is an occupation. And what is winning, really. You have a seven square mile green zone where the US backed president hides and the US military protects him. The rest of the country is a slime of a disaster with oil spills and dead bodies and broken buildings and without infrastructures anywhere. There are no jobs and many Iraqis have fled to refugee camps in other countries.

Winning means securing the oil reserves but the oil is nationalized, meaning Iraq owns it. So the US backed president must open the oil to private corporations.

At that point, the occupation will be successful. But when? The insurgents will never let that happen. Do they nuclear bomb the place and kill ALL the people? Maybe at that point, the war on the people will be won.

2006-12-24 13:20:01 · answer #3 · answered by HawkEye 5 · 2 0

I have said this before, and I am not a Muslim fanatic and I DO NOT support Bin Laden or any other group. I am a westerner like a lot of you, but take my word on this one, it does not matter what GWB does, there is not a chance in hell that he will leave the middle east with anything that resembles a "face saver". Victory does not even come into it.Good will prevail but Im not sure we are "Good" this time, check out the facts. WMD!

2006-12-24 15:25:35 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

No, to win the war, there need to be a clear winner, with key tests od performance, and someone has to lose, so the "loser" has to either be destroyed almost completely, or give up, neither of which is happening. How does anyone define winning the war????? Sadam is gone...woohoo...who cares, Bush is a dunce

2006-12-24 16:37:05 · answer #5 · answered by ray 3 · 0 0

The only thing George Dubya should win is the unobel chaos prize.

With George's semantics who the hell knows what he means by winning or even war for that matter.

2006-12-24 16:03:07 · answer #6 · answered by conspiring4truth 1 · 1 0

After Vietnam? Korea? America only wins when they invade places like Grenada. Any place as big as or bigger than Cuba, forget it. Oh, yes, they claim to fight terrorism too but didn't they fund the IRA when the IRA were terrorists in Britain? Do they know what the hell they are doing at any one time?

2006-12-24 17:00:40 · answer #7 · answered by checkmate 6 · 1 0

in my opinion,its not much of a war.its more like a long lasting invasion.but no,i dont think so.hes gonna send the poor troops home.it would probably be the best thing he's done for the country.no offense to anyone who's still rooting for bush.

2006-12-24 13:20:24 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

U shud see these pics b4 saying anything abt Bush - the smartest President in the world
( No, I haven't used photoshop on them )
Here is the link http://www.freewebs.com/parasit-e/index.htm?post=bush

2006-12-24 17:49:36 · answer #9 · answered by Don 2 · 0 0

Like all your other questions about PRESIDENT GEORGE BUSH, You seem to take him as a threat! You must really hate him very much? Did he blow your little hut up in Iraq or was it Afghanistan. The other people who express so much hate to our President are terrorist, so keep watching your back , might be a missile headed up your way (A**) MERRY CHRISTMAS !!

2006-12-24 16:49:37 · answer #10 · answered by JNISSI 3 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers