Michael Jackson : All the trials to do with fiddling with kids do you think it was a set up or is he the most publicised Paedo out there
2006-12-24 09:48:37 · 19 answers · asked by C 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
"Michael Jackson announced this week that the Neverland Ranch is no longer home to him. He said he can’t go back there. Which of course is really bad news for the kids locked in the crawlspace." — Jay Leno
2006-12-24 09:55:12 · answer #1 · answered by JOHN W 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Michael Jackson is completely innocent!! It was all a get rich quick scheme for gold diggers!! If you read up on the trial and evidence (or lack of it) then you will see just how ridiculous the charges were!! The parents have a history of making up stories to make money!! Do you know the mother actually made her kids steal clothes from J.C. Penny and when they got caught she claimed one of the security guards molested her!?! Michael Jackson would never do anything to hurt any child EVER!!
♥♥We Love You Michael!!!!♥♥
2006-12-24 10:00:32 · answer #2 · answered by ♥Stranger In Maine™♥ (Thriller) 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Unproven in court but looking very bad from where I'm standing! I don't know any grown male that wants to sleep with Kids and I sure as hell wouldn't let Kids of mine do that so.........if he didn't do it why did he pay off that other family so much money to keep that case out of court before the looney mom case? It looks bad and the guy is a freak that I would put much pass.
2006-12-24 09:54:26 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
hes totally not guilty. just some messed up person whos willing to use their child just to get some money, thats just sad. they spoke to the kid and he said that michael wouldnt do someting like that.
2006-12-24 17:40:19 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
A couple of rednecks trying to get rich quick off a (loopy and troubled, granted) celebrity.
2006-12-24 09:50:58 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
I don't know we all have doubts and suspicions.
Maybe in the first court case but the second one was defiantly fixed!.
However if i had children i would probably be very cautious if i ever met him!.
2006-12-24 09:56:16 · answer #6 · answered by Gilly 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I don't know all the facts and didn't see the evidence, so it's not fair to say.
But I wouldn't trust a child of mine to him
2006-12-24 09:50:54 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Either way it is one law for the rich and one for the poor. The poor could not afford his defence lawyers and would be found guilty.
Justice? I don't think so!
2006-12-24 09:54:03 · answer #8 · answered by Spiny Norman 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
well,if he ain't guilty,then he's definitely weird anyway,for wanting to have kids sleep in the same bed as him.
2006-12-24 09:51:28 · answer #9 · answered by mike w 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
In terms of his sexual behaviour , he is very odd. I believe the majority view.
2006-12-24 09:52:57 · answer #10 · answered by ED SNOW 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋