No, they are not fighting for our freedom. And the fact that 3000 of our troops have died not fighting for our freedom, or not protecting the United States is a very sad thing. Someone needs to be held accountable for this.
2006-12-24 11:09:29
·
answer #1
·
answered by truth seeker 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
I, for one don't . Well maybe they are creating a Civil War in Iraq so we don't have to have one over here ? No. I have no idea why we are militarily engaged in Iraq. The reason kept changing.
The mid term elections were about fighting for our freedom.
Let's see some acccountability.
2006-12-24 10:16:13
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
Thats the story we are told, so it must be true. or not. We need oil or we will go broke and die of starvation in agony and as stans children becuse we allowed abortion and some even thought a civil union of a woman and a woman would be a good idea. USA should fight for everybodys freedom everywhere, then we can fight for our freedom here. again.
2006-12-24 08:52:01
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
We'll Saddam not only was a treat to the U.S. he was a treat to the world. He is a dictator nut that used wmd's on his own people. Saddam had all the wmd's moved to syria. We had 5 terror attacks against the U.S during the clinton administration which led up to the attack on 9/11. Once we start fighting back there has been no more attacks, go figure. If clinton had taken the war to them as they did us maybe only one attack during his administration. For anyone that is not familiar what happened back then. world trade center bombing in 93, uss cole bombing, us military barracks bombing in saudia arabia, bombing of two us embassies in africa, attacks against u.s. soldiers in somalia. bill clinton did nothing to fight terrorism that is why were in the mess today. I guess Bush could had done nothing about 9/11 and sit back and let them keep attacking us but I'm glad we have a president w/ some backbone about protecting this nation and not concerned about his sexual needs from interns.
2006-12-24 11:15:41
·
answer #4
·
answered by William S 1
·
1⤊
4⤋
YES YES YES YES YES
The soldiers aren't to blame for the reasons we are in Iraq, they have a job and they do their job. If it wasn't for soldiers willing to give their lives, we wouldn't have all the freedoms that we have in the US today.
2006-12-24 08:49:16
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
It just sounds good in a Campaign Speech.
But in reality, I can't see where going trillions dollars in debt will help America in any way.
2006-12-24 08:52:18
·
answer #6
·
answered by Honest Opinion 5
·
4⤊
0⤋
There are americans that actually believe that !!
There are some that actually believe we won in Vietnam and had one ounce of business being there !!
Santa brings them presents too..they leave milk for him.
2006-12-24 08:50:38
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
1⤋
we are fighting people who hate us for our freedom, but are suppose to give our extra freedoms up for security?? does that even sound feasible?
let me guess, cheney was really out fishing when he accidently shot his friend in the face??
2006-12-24 10:36:36
·
answer #8
·
answered by qncyguy21 6
·
3⤊
1⤋
I still feel sorry for Betty.And yes,it is true.
I can't figure out why someone let a crazy man have possession of a child.
2006-12-24 08:42:23
·
answer #9
·
answered by LIBS ARE FOOLS 2
·
2⤊
3⤋
They were never fighting for your freedom. Saddam never posed a threat to the US at all.
2006-12-24 08:43:09
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
3⤋