No, they don't have the ICBM's Intercontinental ballistic missiles to transport the bomb to here, unless Russia give to them, then is another story, they know better, we have nuclear submarines with thousands of nuclear heads pointing to their territory, if they just try, their country will be evaporated by the hydrogen fussion..☺
2006-12-24 10:00:44
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Not really. You see, there are at any one moment, nuclear submarines stationed at points around the globe poised to launch missiles at any country that might try to strike the US. In addition to that, there are aircraft carriers armed with nuclear weapons. And that does not take into account the hundreds of nuclear tipped missiles we have here that can hit over 40 separate targets at once. If Iran threw a nuke at the US, in just a matter of moments, there would be no Iran. And anyone that thinks that we would hesitate to fire them, is sadly mistaken.
And do not forget that the US has weapons that of a nuclear nature that can take Iran out and not do any damage to the infrastructure. The Neutron bomb can kill ALL life and harm nothing else. And yes, we have a bunch of them.
If you have taken notice, there are aircraft carriers in, around and on the way to the region. I hope that the show of force is enough to avoid trouble, but the Iranian President and his religious handlers may have enough of what it takes to understand the danger they are in. The US in fact could make stealth strikes on individuals if they wanted to.
2006-12-24 16:41:50
·
answer #2
·
answered by It All Matters.~☺♥ 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
Iran is the one to worry, plans are already in the works to nuke them in 2007. And not by the U.S.???
Other Countrys are talking of nuking Iran, Syria, and the dome of the rock with a small nuke in Feb.
2006-12-24 16:30:40
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Iran's President maybe a psycho but he's not stupid. A nuke attack to the USA will mean his country being evaporated from the face of the earth by dozens of nukes raining upon it.
2006-12-24 17:04:01
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
That would be a rather neato payback for the damage we did to them when the CIA ran their country. I can understand why them people are mad at USA, if you found out that Tibet was actually running the USA and that there hasnt been an honest election in 50 years, you would thinkabout toasting Tibet. Same thing. Different perspective.
No I do not worry, it does a person no good to worry. So run the Hummer and the rideing lawn mower while the sprinklers on all week and have fun.
2006-12-24 16:35:21
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Not really. At best, they are years away even without any outside interference. And they'll never have enough to overcome the response we'd deliver if they exploded just one a-bomb on American soil (or Israeli, for that matter).
Where Iranian nukes do become problematic is it provides a deterrent to punitive action in response to Iranian-sponsored terrorism.
2006-12-24 16:51:55
·
answer #6
·
answered by someone 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Israel has already made their commitment, concerning the nuclear capability of Iran... I don't think the US is that far behind either. Europe faces much more danger than does the US but, there is always the probability of them furnishing terrorists with nuclear capability also. Is under watchful eyes presently.
2006-12-24 23:30:33
·
answer #7
·
answered by mrcricket1932 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
US has enough nuclear weapons wipe out the whole world and kill everyone on earth. why should US worry about little Iran having nuclear capability to generate electricity.
2006-12-24 16:45:59
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, let's review.
Missile guidance systems are much more problematic than simply making a nuclear explosion. He can make the boom, but he has to make it here.
Do I feel better? Nope.
Our border security sucks so badly that a determined hiker can get in through Mexico and be demonstrating on our streets while waving the Mexican flag...demanding more rights for illegals.
If they can get through, I guarantee you folks could get through carrying the stuff to assemble a nuke. NORAD would be useless, other than to say "Holy crap, there was a big boom on the East Coast...that was Washington DC. Who do we call now?"
If I can think of this while eating my triscuit Nachos, I guarantee you someone more cranky than me has thought of it.
2006-12-24 16:29:34
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
No I'm not. I'm more worried what the U.S. government will attempt to do in the name of security after establishing a significant amount of hysteria.
2006-12-24 16:30:09
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋