2006-12-24 05:32:57 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous in Pregnancy & Parenting ➔ Pregnancy
Good question. 35, I think. After that, it all gets more complicated and too risky. Besides, you gotta have the stamina to keep up with your toddler, or may wanna live enough to see your grandchildren. I think that women should have kids between 21-35, not too early, not too late. In that period of time you can have 4 kids or more, if you want to (although the world is overpopulated as it is).
I'm 27, married (I believe that's important too, to offer a child a real family environment), at my first pregnancy & carrying twins (they're natural, I don't believe in fertility treatments and stuff like that) and they're gonna be my only children. I consider myself to be mature enough to have them, yet not too old to conceive and go through a successful pregnancy & birth.
Happy Holidays!
2006-12-24 08:04:35 · answer #1 · answered by wiccanwarrior1979 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I think over 40 is too old not just because of the pregnancy complications but if you have a baby when your 40 you will be 60 when your kids are 20 and will be very old when your kids have kids (your grand kids).... I have one set of grand parents who are in their 80's and one set in their 60's I am a lot closer to the younger set because they can actually do stuff with us grand kids and now ( my son) who is their great grandson I am 19 and if I didn't have my son young my one set of grandparents would probably not have lived to even meet any of their great grand kids at one point on my mom's side of the family we had 5 generations!!! and had 5 generations for 10 years we almost had 5 generations again when I had my son but unfortunately my great grandma passed away 1 year before I had my son.... if you have your kids in your 40's your lucky if you have 3 generations!! maybe that doesn't bother you but I would love to be around to see my grand kids get married and have kids of their own !! just my opinion though
2006-12-24 15:27:42 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
My age limit would be 38 because the risk of birth defects go up and I do NOT want a child still in the house when I'm ready to retire.
2006-12-24 14:14:17 · answer #3 · answered by dolly 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Honestly, I would not have a child past 35. The extra tests and risks that there are increase after 35 and if I could, I would rather not have to put myself and my baby through that.
2006-12-24 13:55:40 · answer #4 · answered by Soon2BMommy 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
It is all up to you and what your doctor thinks about it. I'm 23 and I'm pregnant with my second. I just want to be a young mom. So when my kids are 10, I'll be 33 and so forth. I think that is a great age, but like i said it's all up to you and how you think. Good luck.
2006-12-24 13:45:18 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
30. I refuse to have more kids after that age. I am now 27 and trying for my 4th child. I am giving myself until then. If I hit 30 and there is no pregnancy, I'm off to get fixed.
2006-12-24 13:49:54 · answer #6 · answered by Velken 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
I am 18 right now. I don't have any kids. But if I dont have a kid by the time I am 26, I am not having any. But when I do have kids once i make thirty that's a wrap.
2006-12-24 16:40:20 · answer #7 · answered by chinesefoodruleZ 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
36
2006-12-24 13:34:33 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
probably anytime after 35.I am 24 and pregnant with my 2nd baby and my hubby and I would like to be done haveing kids by the time we are in our early 30's.We would like 3 possibly 4 total.
2006-12-24 13:36:09 · answer #9 · answered by mama of 2 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
anytime after 40 you should stop having kids becuse of the risk on you and the life of your child
2006-12-24 13:41:15 · answer #10 · answered by Rachel Y 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋