Only one way to tell, a bench-press match at the next pay-per-view. My money's on Batista
2006-12-24 05:01:08
·
answer #1
·
answered by Gravyboat 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Batista
2006-12-24 12:11:30
·
answer #2
·
answered by Armani Action 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Batista Umaga don't have any muscles he is all FAT but Batista probably is more Muscular and Massive
2006-12-24 12:09:56
·
answer #3
·
answered by Malik 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Batista!
2006-12-24 12:32:13
·
answer #4
·
answered by Gen 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Tuff Question.
Though I would have to say both. Because although Umaga is pretty strong and tuff. But Batista is the World Heavy Weight Champion. Doesn't that say something about how strong or weak he is?
2006-12-24 13:32:27
·
answer #5
·
answered by Cassie210 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Umaga dosen't seem to feel pain very easily and is very steady for guy his size. But my favourite out of the two is Batista. Although i don't think he's as strong as Lashley, i like his style and techniq and that he's humble - think he's great. Merry xmas
2006-12-24 11:59:30
·
answer #6
·
answered by ManicBI 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Batista owns man, Umaga is just fat, jure greasy oily fat just like Mark Henry.
2006-12-24 12:25:48
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Batista is stronger because muscle weighs a lot more then fat.
2006-12-24 16:15:50
·
answer #8
·
answered by HHH 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
In a match, which would be one heck of a great fight, I think Batista would be the winner.
2006-12-25 21:11:17
·
answer #9
·
answered by ironchain15 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
hmmm batista or jamal....oops umaga....dont care coth of them suck, ever listen to batista on the mic? only thing good bout jamal is his manager armondo alihondro estrada. but i guess off pure strength batista
2006-12-24 12:24:03
·
answer #10
·
answered by rizinoutlaw 5
·
0⤊
0⤋